Answer:
D. given the right to vote.
Explanation:
Only about 3 percent of mammals are monogamous, and orangutans are not one of these. Gibbons, for example, are a type of ape that mates for life, but they have a different reproductive cycle that orangutans. Orangutans reproduce very slowly, and the females are very selective in the process of mating, so what happens is that the males compete in this process with each other.
In captive orangutans, it is shown that females tend to avoid copulation seeking out desirable males, but that the males tend to forcefully initiate it daily, regardless of the resistance they get from females. Also, the males and females differ in size, with males being bigger than females, and when smaller male orangutans copulate with a female, larger orangutans often take their place forcefully.
In conclusion, you can see that orangutans are not monogamous, but rather promiscuous in their reproductive behavior, when you see a bigger male forcefully initiating copulation with a smaller female, displacing the smaller males.
Answer:
C. Deep faith in God.
Explanation:
I'm not a 100% sure but I believe it is C.
Answer:
It depends on the situation. If the buyer of the property that was stolen knew it was stolen then the law should be enforced, but if the buyer had no clue then it's a different story. See, when the buyer has knowledge of the criminal activity he should go straight to the law to have the situation taken care of and have the thief prosecuted. Now if the buyer had no clue about the criminal activities behind the property he has bought and later gets caught with it should be interrogated and used to the advantage of the law to catch the real theif so he/she can be prosecuted lawfully.
