Answer:
Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.
At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:
the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents
attributing false conclusions to books and sources
manipulating statistical data
deliberately mis-translating texts
This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.
Answer:
By October 1990, Germany was reunified, triggering the swift collapse of the other East European regimes. People celebrating the fall of the Berlin Wall.
Explanation:
Southern poland and many people worked various kinds of labor for 11 hours and roll call prolonged and bad weather was tormenting for them and many have died or were killed while laboring and other causes.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Zhou dynasty (Chinese pinyin: Zhou was a Chinese dynasty that followed the Sang dynasty and preceded the In dynasty.
A) Anti-Catholic could be used to characterize "Calles' Law" of the following options mentioned above. Calles Law was a statute enacted by the then President of Mexico, whose last name was Calles, where he re-enforced Article 130, which stated that church and state should be separate, but this largely entailed prohibiting priests and ministers from having certain inherently human rights.
