Problematic decision-making process Meaghan is using sunk cost fallacy.
As an example, individuals every so often order an excessive amount of meals and then over-devour just to “get their money's worth”. similarly, a person might also have a $20 ticket to a live performance after which drive for hours through a snowfall, just due to the fact she feels that she has to attend because of having made the preliminary investment.
A sunk cost refers to a cost that has already happened and has no potential for recovery in the future. For instance, your rent, marketing campaign prices or money spent on a new devices can be taken into consideration sunk prices. A sunk price can also be referred to as a beyond price.
Learn more about investment here: brainly.com/question/1305349
#SPJ4
Answer:
"Inconsistency" seems to be the correct response.
Explanation:
- It might be because for someone else makes a decision and those whose intervention does not in itself follow the values, everything just indicates there's conflict throughout his words and deeds as well as his principles.
- This would be the justification that the second hypothesis seems to be inconsistent with people's perceptions and values.
Private schools tend to outperform public (state) schools
