Answer:
if this is for me to answer i would say
In the summer I went on holiday to Spain with my mum, dad, brothers, sisters and niece and nephew and we had an amazing time there. We went to the beach when it was hot and sunny and we had ice cream where it melted so quickly we needed to go and buy another ice cream and we made sand castles and played in the sea and after we went the beach we went to the pier and bought some sweets and played at the fair. Sadly, we had to go home but we had lots of fun and played lots of games.
Answer:
I think it is C, It is wise to follow the counsel of trusted friend
Explanation:
Answer:
CSIPR is a technology that can use to edit the gene. CRISPR technology is remarkable if done with basic requirements.
The positive implications are;
1. It is highly accurate
2. It is precise
3 It has least errors possible
4. Technological development scope is high
5.Specificity like never seen before.
6.Use in immunity, gene therapy, treating disability.
7) It increases the yield of crops , increasing there resistance etc.
And the negative effects are;
1. There are some errors which neeb to be improved
2.Moral hygiene and future human weapons for terrorism missuse etc.
3. The misuse
4 Moving away from natural selection to artificial creation.
Answer:
conflict is a standard part of our everyday lives. considering nobody perspectives matters in the exact same manner, disagreement will most certainly occur at some point in time. conflict is genuinely a distinction of opinion and is considered to be a regular part of our normal lives. There are several different types of conflict and not all of them are considered to be bad. There are many reasons for conflict, the different sorts of conflict, and barriers to conflict. just as there are disadvantages to conflict, there are also numerous advantages. in order to avoid getting into conflicts you could do things differently.
for instance, if you are at work and walk by someone’s desk and accidently knock their pen at the floor. unexpectedly, the character lashes out and starts to curse at you. knowing that this is not regular for your coworker, it would be safe to expect that they may be under some form of stress or have other things on their mind. by knowing this, it will become easier to reply in a more responsible, tempered, and suitable, manner. sometimes their ego can end up a reason for struggle as well. There may also come a time when a person is wrong about some thing or they'll have made a mistake but they do not want to admit it. due to the fact they have got this sort of excessive ego, they may turn out to be self-protective of their state of affairs, therefore causing conflict because they refuse to admit they have been incorrect. instead they will choose to become persistent in standing their ground, whether they may be right or wrong.
during communication, if the intended goals are not clearly identified, there may be a more possibility for errors and it could further irritate a situation, causing conflict. because each individual is different there are bound to be clashes within certain personality types. for instance, if someone prefers to discuss everything in detail and the other person prefers to get straight to the point then they could have a character conflict due to the fact they aren't seeing things eye-to-eye. they'll view the other person as being incompetent or irresponsible at the same time as the other person starts arguing.
conflict is inevitable in a workplace. it is a reality in every work environment through bringing people from diverse backgrounds together. even as people continue to work in teams while being concerned about the manner they are treated by their work team individuals, disagreements will usually arise to create conflicts in the workplaces.
Explanation: there you go
Julius Caesar is a play deeply concerned with the idea of rhetoric, or persuasion. The play is driven by persuasion. Cassius convinces Brutus that Caesar must die, setting the story in motion. The resolution of the plot is decided by Antony's speech to the plebeians. Shakespeare sees rhetoric as one of the most powerful forces in the world; able to topple kings and crown them. The play, Julius Caesar, examines what gives rhetoric its power by pitting Brutus's speech against Mark Antony's. Shakespeare shows Antony's rhetoric to be superior by the effect he has on the plebeians.
Brutus's speech fails to convince permanently win over the crowd because he does not understand them. His first failure is at the beginning of his speech when he asks the plebeians to, "Censure me in you wisdom, and awake your senses". It seems as though he does not realize that he is speaking to an angry mob. His argument is based on cold and calculating reason. He argues that the love of freedom is stronger than the ties of friendship. "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more". This logic cannot sink deeply into an emotional mob. He asks the plebeians to "Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe". He cannot use his honor as a reason for belief in his story when his honor is in question. Brutus fails to offer any proof of Caesar's ambition, the central point of his argument. He ends his speech with a verbal attack on any who disagree with him, essentially calling them cowards. This silences dissension temporarily but when the other side is presented it does not help his cause. Brutus's argument fails because he much less a man of the people than he would like to think.
Mark Antony's argument is a great piece of rhetoric. He successfully accomplishes his object of convincing the plebeians that Brutus is a traitor. He has mastered the use of emotion, subtlety and logic. He uses emotional phrases such as, "My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar" and "Oh judgment, thou art fled to brutish beasts". Which give him a connection with the emotion the crowd is feeling at the death of Caesar. He begins not by attacking Brutus..
