Answer:
A. He does not include any information about Soviet technology for comparison to support his point.
Explanation:
While he does talk about how America will surpass its previous accomplishments, he never gives comparisons with Soviet Technology
The logical inference a person can make about the “good lesson” the narrator wants to teach the American artist is:
- <u>He would have shown him how there was no freedom in China twenty years ago</u>
<u />
According to the given question, the narrator says that the American artist is making unnecessary protests about having so little freedom.
This shows an irony that he does not appreciate the freedom he enjoys and feels he lacks freedom.
As a result of this, we can see that the logical inference we can make about the good lesson which he wants to teach the American artist is that he would show him how little freedom there was in China twenty years ago and how he enjoys freedom.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/8369124
First map
1 cm------ 10 km
40 cm---- x
x= (40 * 10) /1
x= 400 km, Cincinnati is 400 km away from Cleveland.
Second map
1 cm------ 50 km
x---------- 400 km
x= (400 * 1) /50
x= 8, Cincinnati is 8 cm away from Cleveland.
Answer:
The story describes a young middle-class English woman who "had no luck." Although outwardly successful, she is haunted by a sense of failure; her husband is not good and her job as a commercial artist does not earn as much as she would like. Family life exceeds their income and unspoken anxiety about money permeates the home. Her children, a son Paul and her two sisters, feel this anxiety; children even say they can hear the house whispering, "There must be more money."
Paul tells his uncle Oscar Cresswell about gambling on horse races with Bassett, the outfielder. He has been making bets using his pocket money and has won and saved three hundred and twenty pounds. Sometimes he says he is "sure" of a winner for an upcoming race and that the horses he names win, sometimes with remarkable odds. Uncle Oscar and Bassett make big bets on the horses that Paul names.
After more profit, Paul and Oscar arrange to give the mother a gift of £ 5,000, but the gift only allows her to spend more. Disappointed, Paul tries harder than ever to be "lucky". As the Derby approaches, Paul is determined to learn the winner. Concerned about his health, his mother returns home from a party and discovers his secret. He has spent hours riding his rocking horse, sometimes overnight, until he "gets there," to a clairvoyant state where he can be sure of the winner's name.
On the other hand, the pyramid explanation always starts from an important or more pathognomonic point of the analysis, and then it is explained in different aspects. Ideally, the topic of the pyramid peak should be the most relevant and, as it develops, it should cover other less relevant topics, thus considering the less important topics as those of the "base".
Explanation:
Think of a pyramid structure that starts at the top as a single point and expands more as we go to different lower levels.
