Answer:
Option: Abundant resources
Free land.
Explanation:
Oregon attracted settlers because of abundant land, fertile soil, and mild climate. The rich fertile lands of Oregon brought thousands of pioneers. People from Missouri, Indiana, and Illinois found the rich farmland in areas like the Willamette valley persuasive. Trappers also attracted because of the abundant fur-bearing animals. The land was free to those who could make it the Oregon Territory. People began to assemble their belonging and took the trail in wagons pulled by oxen.
C. B<span>ritish Settlement and Colonization of Georgia</span>
The 1948 United States Presidential Election is considered apart from being one of the biggest electoral upsets in American history, the start of an era of great economic prosperity and growth of the United States as a superpower in the land of politics.
After winning the election then President elect Harry S. Truman implemented and oversaw various policies in order to contain and stop the influence of communism around the world which culminated in the entry of the United States in the Korean war.
During this time period President Truman also oversaw the approval of NSC 68, a secret statement of foreign policy. Which sought to increase the defense budget and in turn increase the military prowess of the US and weaken the Soviet Union's influence as much as possible.
The results of the 1948 Presidential Elections also influenced the reform of civil rights in the US, more specifically voting rights and fair employment rights, these reforms also had a key role in ending racial segregation in the armed forces.
Answer:
A. limit free speech.
Explanation:
The first amendment of United States constitution protect the citizens' ability for "Free speech". This law was intended to give the citizens with the power to protest the government. But many people interpret it as the ability to say whatever they want to other people without consequences.
The "clear and present danger' test was devised by the Supreme Court. The consist of standards that law enforcement can follow to differentiate "Free speech" and assault.
As a general rule, If the speech that given by a person either threatening the welfare of individuals, disrupt public order, or agitating other individuals to be a target for attack, that speech would no longer be protected by the 1st amendment.
