Pros and cons of being king in medieval times

2 answers:

6 0

Pros- 1.<span>Best health care 2.Constant supply of food 3.Tax-free living 4.Various house holds 5.Land 6.Respect (See Cons) 7.Divine Right of Kings 8.Education</span>
Cons- 1.<span>Your children would have been in arranged marriages 2.YOU were probably in an arranged marriage 3.You were responsible for the care of your kingdom 4.In a battle you probably had to fight and you were a prime target 5.Respect had to be upheld 6.Tough decisions such as who should live and die 7.Civil War 8.Little time at home</span>

MaRussiya [10]3 years ago

5 0

Being king is amazing. Have anything you want, be in power of everyone else within your land. Sometimes being king isn't a good thing as well. So much stress can occur like war, trading, assassinations could be involved any point in their life time.

You might be interested in

Tools became more complex during the Middle Stone Age.

Roman55 [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

its was in early human stage

7 0

3 years ago

When did Indian civilization begin

svet-max [94.6K]

Answer:

Around 3000 BCE

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

How did Napoleon lure his enemy to attack him ?

pashok25 [27]

Answer:

In his battles as in his campaigns, Napoleon depended on speed, mass, and aggressive maneuver: normally he struck at one wing of a hostile army, preferably the one nearer its communications. Only at Austerlitz did he actually stand on the defensive and lure his enemies into a trap.

Can I plz be brainliest?

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following was not brought to Latin America by the Spanish? A. Christianity B. diseases C. pigs and sheep D. coffee

zysi [14]

Pigs and sheep is the corect awnser

4 0

3 years ago

What is the credibility of the source?

DerKrebs [107]

Credibility of the source is checking the degree of authenticity of a source

(You want to know how reliable is this information?)

There are multiple factors that can help to check its credibility:

Is the author of the source trusted?
Is the background of the source safe?
Is it a primary or secondary source?
Have the source become unaccurate or
obsolete due to time?
Is there any motive or signs that the source is biased?

7 0

3 years ago