Answer: You sort table data with commands that are displayed when you click a header arrow button. Hope it help's :D
Answer:
The data-link layer
Explanation:
The physical layer and data-link layer are often confused a lot especially in terms of what they do in the TCP/IP 7 layer protocol. The physical layer as the name suggests represents the physical devices like the cables and the connectors that join or interconnect computers together. This layer is also responsible for sending the signals over to other connections of a network. The data-link, on the other hand, translates and interprets these sent binary signals so that network devices can communicate. This layer is responsible in adding mac addresses to data packets and encapsulating these packets into frames before being placed on the media for transmission. Since it resides in between the network layer and the physical layer, it connects the upper layers of the TCP/IP model to the physical layer.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is:
To create fades you can click and then drag the end of the clip with a smart tool.
Fade Dialog Box is the fade curve.
Explanation:
Smart Tool is an application which also provide their users with the features of the quick access menu by which they can easily access their programs or the software.
By using smart tool the user also creates a crossfade.
Answer:
Option (D) i.e., Parallel start up is correct option to the following question.
Explanation:
Parallel startup is also an application or software or a way of using the application of the other Operating System in others just like that the following XYZ inc. has trust on older platform but their system give them cautions for update then they use parallel set up by which they also use old software, as well as they, use the Mac's software in Windows. This strategy provides both the option of usage.
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
