Answer:
(This is an opinionated question so there actually is no right or wrong answer. I will put what <em>I </em>would have answered, and you can change it up it's not what you would put :] )
Explanation:
I would have chosen more peaceful tactics. Though it's true that the Soviet Union may have went against any peace treaties as they have plenty of times, it's ultimately a better option than spending all our time and money, that could be better spent on other things within our country, on stockpiling weapons. It has been useful in being a reminder to other countries not to test the U.S., but it's also cost a lot of money that could be put towards better causes.
I hope this helped :)
John Swift examines a vital element of the Cold War and assesses the motives of the Superpowers. Nuclear weapon test, 1956The destruction of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by American atomic weapons in August 1945 began an arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union.
Answer:
here's your answer
Explanation:
The colonisation of Africa was part of a global European process reaching all the continents of the world. European colonisation and domination changed the world dramatically
I hope it's helpful for you.......
Is is a question about what they help the criminal to do or whether the statement is true?
The statement is true: an accomplice does help a criminal, and does so knowingly. Together, they commit a crime or wrongdoing (in case what they do is immoral but not illegal).