The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete and does not provide any options or further references, we can say that some might see that as a problem because of the following: "All states splitting their electoral votes between the candidates based on what percentage of the popular vote they won."
To understand this answer we have to include the following idea. The scenario described in this question is a supposed presidential election organized in 2028. There are two candidates. Democratic Senator Rosa Marcus and Republican candidate Ted Torres. Marcus was declared victorious after having 5 more Electoral votes than Torres. With those 5 more votes, candidate Marcus reaches the 270 votes needed for the Electoral College could get a winner in the election. So with that context, the kind of adjustment needed in the Electoral College to change a situation like this would be that all states splitting their electoral votes between the candidates based on what percentage of the popular vote they won.
Answer:
E: Shays Rebellion
Explanation:
Shays Rebellion occurred in Massachusetts in response to perceived unjust economic policies and an increased effort to collect taxes on individuals as well as their trades. Daniel Shay (the leader) was a Revolutionary war veteran who believed the government was trying to act too much like the oppressors they escaped, and convinced enough other people that taxes = evil, which lead to the rebellion.
Answer:
The Senate
Explanation:
House of Representatives elect members based off city population and importance so it would be over 100. The Senate elect 2 members per state. There are 50 States in the U.S.A. 2 times 50=100.
Answer: I would have to say either A or C, im a little more confident in C tho :)
Explanation: Brainliest is awlays helpful
Answer:
Joseph Gurney Cannon known as the "Uncle Joe" Cannon who was one of the most powerful speaker of the house in the United State history. He is the second longest continuously serving speaker of the house from Republican party. he had immense control over the house of representatives of United States.Using his power, he could block the file from passing which he didn't like. He was also against of any kind of reform. He wanted America as it was.
With immense power and law, he could control the which file would go on the floor, would be presented for vote as the speaker. He suppressed the law from voting which he didn't support.
On March 17, 1910 after failing two times to curb Cannon's power over the house the Nebraska representative Norris along with 46 progressive republican and entire 149 democrats to revolt against Cannon.On that day some of the most powerful allies of Cannon were absent.
However, Cannon survived but his absolute power over the house decreased.
So the main reason of revolt against Cannon was his absolute use of power, non progressive thinking.
Explanation:
