Explanation:
the rights for the women would be the last option.
Women are entitled to own property and earn a living.
I would like to add a bit in here so please dont mind me.
Actually I read a book titled <em>for</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>love</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em> </em><em>son</em><em> </em>and this book is based on the muslim culture and all. after reading that book, I thought that everywhere in the country where islam is followed I thought that women will be treated wrongfully until I asked one of my muslim friend from Egypt. that's when I knew that the women are not treated that way in other countries. what I wanna say here is that, if y'all have the same confusion as me, I wanna yell you that you're wrong too. I dunno how to end lol.
have a good day ^^
1) I suppose that it would be sensible to consider European to be benefited most from social, technological, and economic change from 1200 to 1500. I think so because during this period of time there was invented a lot of progressive mechanical devices such as water wheels and windmills, even though it was very expensive, the Europe assumed such responsibility and got a nice profit eventually.
2) One of the major environmental and technological factors which led Spain and Portugal to explore new trade routes in the Atlantic was a plan to find a shorter hence more economical trade route. They tried to find a shorter route than rounding Africa.
The Ayyubid dynasty ruled over Egypt as well as territories in regions that are now part of Syria, Iraq and Yemen. Their control extended from the late 12th into the early 13th century. Eventually the slave-soldiers who rose to power and prominence militarily, the Mamluks. The Mamluks took over power in Egypt in 1250. Ayyubid rule continued in some parts of Syria after that, but the Ayyubids were fading from the scene.
Jesus brings spiritual salvation to believers is a central teaching of Christianity.