1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cricket20 [7]
3 years ago
5

In this unit, you learned about civilizations that once existed in the Mediterranean and the Middle East. Within these civilizat

ions, you learned about different types of governments that were created to rule over people and lands. Identify some of the different types of governments that you learned about and the civilization with which they were associated. Compare and contrast these different governments, using facts from the lessons. Next, imagine that you are a leader of a new civilization in this region. Which type of government would you have supported in your kingdom or empire? Why?
History
2 answers:
lapo4ka [179]3 years ago
6 0

We have learned about the ancient civilizations of India and China. If I were a leader of a new civilization, I would support representative democracy, as it is a type of democracy founded on the principle of elected officials representing a group of people.

Explanation:

There is really no explanation hope this helps!!

Viefleur [7K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The different government that we have learned about is democracy, tripartite, roman republic and monarchy government. How these governments are different is because with a tripartite you have three different branches: the Legislative branch is to pass laws, the judicial branch is to settle disputes about the law, and the executive branch is to carry the laws out so their power is evenly distributed. Monarchy is where You have a single person in charge. Democracy is where the people involved in the government choose to be legislators. Finally the roman republic was where Rome elected leaders and the leaders were limited to one year in power and a small group of wealthy and powerful men controlled how the government was run.  The similarities for all these governments are that the governments had to be led by someone.  They type of government is democracy and a little bit of monarchy and the reason why is because i would want my people to have a say so in who is going to be in are government and in whatever we do but were the little bit of monarchy would come in at is I would hear both sides of the story then make a decision.  For example say two brothers were arguing and one said he only wanted only Powerade and the other ]brother wants Gatorade and then they go to their dad and wats his opinion and then he has to make the decision of which one to get or maybe get neither.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did the british respond to indian acts of civil disobedence in the early 1920s
juin [17]

It was an act of nonviolent civil disobedience in colonial India to produce salt from seawater, as it had been practised by the Indian people. ... And so, Mahatma Gandhi declared resistance to British salt policies to be the unifying theme for the civil disobedience movement and thus started Dandi March

6 0
4 years ago
Which of the following best explains how the locations
Softa [21]

Answer:

B or C

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
;w; i know can someone tell me if this is right
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

Qin Shi Huang

Qin Shi Huang

In 229 B.C., the Qin seized Zhao territory and continued until they seized all five Zhou states to create a unified Chinese empire in 221 B.C

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Hey i need you to make your own answer and not someone elses answer
ANTONII [103]
Hmm. maybe to prove the Japanese Americans were completely innocent, and that they were on the states side. to show that their race didn’t mean they were on japans side. and to just help the cause of fighting the war. hope that helped
8 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast what you know about the current U.S. government with government outlined in the Articles of Confederation.
umka2103 [35]

Answer:

We will notice that even though they were written within a period of just over a decade and mostly by the same people, the differences are quite clear between them.

Explanation:

If we compare the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of the U.S we would get a fair idea of the differences between them. The Articles were heavily criticized for centralizing all the powers in the hands of state governments and leaving the central government at their disposal. But this wasn't the only distinguishing point between these documents. The two distinguished in several ways such as the judiciary, power of levying taxes, the number of votes in Congress, etc.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was a central idea in Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theological?
    15·2 answers
  • The letter helped prosecutors at the Nuremberg Trials prove
    8·1 answer
  • Before the creation of Israel, Palestine was mostly populated by . According to the Arab League, the creation of Israel .
    11·2 answers
  • Which sociologist is correctly paired with his view of society?
    7·2 answers
  • Which outcomes took place after the Fall of Constantinople? Choose three correct answers
    7·2 answers
  • HELP! For what type of literature is James Thurber best known?
    11·1 answer
  • Easy question!!
    8·1 answer
  • April 26th, 1862.
    7·2 answers
  • What are some of the lessons that we can learn from Jesus' miracle of feeding the five thousand?
    5·1 answer
  • After europeans discovered north america, france claimed all the territories encompassing the ______ system.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!