Answer:Ok i will help you here are some reasons why
Explanation:The death penalty is irreversible. Absolute judgments may lead to people paying for crimes they did not commit. Texas man Cameron Todd Willingham was executed in Texas in 2004 for allegedly setting a fire that killed his three daughters. Following his execution, further evidence revealed that Willingham did not set the fire that caused their deaths. But it came too late.There is no credible evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than a prison term. In fact, evidence reveals the opposite.
Since abolishing the death penalty in 1976, Canada’s murder rate has steadily declined and as of 2016 was at its lowest since 1966.The 2006 execution of Angel Nieves Diaz, by a so-called ‘humane’ lethal injection, took 34 minutes and required two doses. Doctors have said that it is likely Diaz’ death was painful.
Other brutal methods of execution used around the world include hanging, shooting and beheading. The nature of these deaths only continues to perpetuate the cycle of violence and may not alleviate the pain already suffered by the victims’ family.Executions are often undertaken in an extremely public manner, with public hangings in Iran or live broadcasts of lethal injections in the US. According to UN human rights experts, executions in public serve no legitimate purpose and only increase the cruel, inhuman and degrading nature of this punishment.
“All executions violate the right to life. Those carried out publicly are a gross affront to human dignity which cannot be tolerated,” said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, Amnesty International’s Deputy Director for the Middle East and North Africa.In 2017 two countries – Guinea and Mongolia – abolished the death penalty for all crimes.
Today, 106 countries (the majority of the world’s states) have turned their backs on the death penalty for good.Those that continue to execute are a tiny minority standing against a wave of opposition.
There are countless arguments for and against the death penalty. In an imperfect world where we can never be sure we have ever got the “worst of the worst” is it ever justified to take a life?
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Are you kidding me, people cant answer this youre wasting good points. For NOTHING
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
I predict that the book will be about Its seems like its about a man or woman  whos done a lot of bad things but there's a reason but from the part that the quote that said “Don’t judge a man until you’ve walked two moons in his moccasins.” I think that this book will be very interesting because from the quote “Don’t judge a man until you’ve walked two moons in his moccasins''  I thought about the quote don't judge a book by its cover. If this book about a man who did bad things for a good reason then my prediction would be right.
Explanation:
When i read that I got the quote don't judge a book by its cover.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
<h3>35 × 16 = (7 × 5) × (8 × 2) = (7 × 8) × (5 × 2) = 56 × 10 </h3>
Explanation:
Given the expression 35 × 16, the one way to find the equivalent value is expressed as shown;
35 × 16 
35 = 7*5
16 = 8*2
Substituting this factors into the expression
35 × 16  = (7*5) * (8*2)
35 × 16  = (7*8) * (5*2)
35 × 16  = (56) * (10)
35 × 16  = 560 
 
        
             
        
        
        
The author is trying to portray that all parts are important even though some may come smaller or larger than other. Nothing could happen as planned without the smaller of bigger parts