Answer:
an account of someone's life written by someone else
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
A rigid education is one that has very well established concepts and that imposes little freedom for those who are submitted to them. Although many people claim that this type of education is abusive and suffocating, we cannot deny that it imposes social advantages on the individuals who go through it and this is something good and progressive in our society.
Rigid education imposes discipline, rationality, politeness and racism. This is because it is based on very well-defined principles, which must be followed completely and totally. An example of benefits that strict education can promote is seen in "Jane Eyre", where the protagonist Jane, who received a very strict education, developed as a very well-controlled person with clear and defined goals, in addition to being able to develop a plan to reach them, without that kind of education, Jane would probably not be so disciplined in her life and could often get lost in her goals.
Answer:
On July 13th, a federal judge permanently prohibited the heartbeat law in the state of Georgia from taking effect. The heartbeat law would have stopped abortion, except for some exceptions, after a heartbeat is detected in a fetus.
The federal ruling said the heartbeat law was unconstitutional and violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
The heartbeat law has always faced controversy and criticism from pro-abortion advocates who argued that the heartbeat bill was restrictive on women who wanted an abortion and that many women were unaware they were pregnant until the heartbeat could be detected.
This heartbeat law is not about the restriction on women who want an abortion but protecting the rights to life of the unborn child.
We want our laws to be able to defend and uphold morality, and equality and it is saddening that when laws like these are put in place, it is said to be restrictive on women. If anything, the prohibition of the heartbeat law is an attack on unborn children who have their rights taken away.
This law has nothing to do with partisan politics as I am pro-life and worked with Republicans and Democrats when drafting this law.
According to Judge Steven Jones, is the heartbeat law truly unconstitutional? It is completely reasonable to consider the heartbeat of a fetus as a sign of life and the Constitution exists to protect such a life.
So far, the federal court has made a ruling but Governor Kemp has made it clear he would file for an appeal and I hope that when it matters most, more thought would be put for the dignity and rights of the unborn rather than partisan narratives.
Rev. Dean Nelson is the executive director of Human Coalition Action.
Answer: She feels confident about continuing on to Kans.
Explanation:
This is the correct answer because, in the end, she is saying that "Hmmph. Well, we've come this far. We'll just have to go on without him."
She feels confident about it even though she does not know how to get there without the gu( that is why the second statement is false). She does not want to return to Louisiana with her family, she wants to continue the journey and that is why the first statement is also false.
The third statement is false because she is not angry at Nate, she is angry at the guru because he stole their money and disappear.
Answer:
It should be on the page where it says "Ask"
If it isn't then I'm not sure
I hope this helps!