Expressions of a similar root with various appends are well thoroughly considered distinctive words, so in such manner it would take after that there would be more words. But on the off chance that you mean there may be an ability to change an existing word essentially and obviously put off or nullify individuals designing altogether new words, root what not? In that situation, particularly thinking about each change of a root is in principle a different word, there would be no much affect; all words need to begin from some place.
<span>Words of the same root with different affixes are well
thought-out different words, so in that regard it would follow that there would
be more words. But if you mean there might be a capability to change an
existing word simply and clearly put off or negate people inventing entirely
new words, root and all? In that circumstance, especially considering each
modification of a root is in theory a separate word, there would be no much
impact; all words have to start from somewhere.</span>
C) Because it saves on shipping costs, and if the European firm got mad we'd be screwed. Wholly owning the subsidiary allows complete control and if it fails we simply pull out. Our patents are protected and free from the potential of sabotage.
