The correct answer is A) Did the researches tried to find any common factor in its subjects that would influence both hours spent sitting and the likelihood of developing diabetes?
The other options of the question are B) Who pay for this research and what possible motivations would they have to skew the results in a way that would benefit them? C) What are the average mortality rates associated with diabetes and does this risk offset the benefits of sitting comfortably at work? D) How did the researchers measure how many hours the subject sits per day and what qualifies as an official diabetes diagnosis?
A new high-profile study reports a strong connection between how long people sit every day and how likely they are to develop diabetes. The question that best represents a critical examination of the research is " Did the researches tried to find any common factor in its subjects that would influence both hours spent sitting and the likelihood of developing diabetes?"
A critical examination is the kind of evaluation approach that uses a systemathic and logical way to understand the phenomenon at study. The issue is studied in a systematic way to analyze the content and the variables in order to find the best alternative for the solution. That is why the question "A" best represents critical examination.
Answer:
recover damages
Explanation:
From the explanation above,we can deduce or conclude that this is a clear case of fraud in which the aforementioned parties which are Don(victim)a and Eve(perpetrator) of this case of fraud.
First and foremost,we should have an idea of what fraud means or connotes-It is an intentional or purposeful act deception by a individual(s) or body as the case may be towards another individual(s) or entity for the purpose of financial or material gains,not minding the medium in which it was portrayed.And it centres around lies,in order to convince or confuse the victim as the case maybe.
So in this case,Eve having lied to Don about having access to a stock-trading algorithm which could multiply an investment and thus,it wasn't so,then Don would have to file a suit and a proof of injury is required to recover damages in order to void the contract and get back money paid earlier on the basis of the contract,instead of affirming the contract because no sort of financial gains were made in the stock-trading transaction.
Answer: Eric's dad is using <u>authoritative parenting style.</u>
Explanation:
Parents who opt for authoritative parenting style have high standards, but also take child's emotional needs into consideration. Those parents define clear boundaries of what is acceptable and what is not, but maintain a healthy relationship with their children. Most importantly, they do not just expect blind obedience from their children, but explain the reasons behind their decisions. In this case, Eric's dad interrupts Eric in his game, but reasons with his son and explains why he is not allowed to continue playing.
Answer:
Crystallized intelligence
Explanation:
Crystallized intelligence is the intelligence in which the knowledge is gained through prior learning and the experience of a person. It is based on the facts and the rooted experience of a person. It is increased throughout our life span. As we grew older it increased. Crystallized intelligence is not the form of fluid intelligence.
Thus here in the above statement, Zane's mother seems to know every historical event due to her crystallized intelligence because it grew according to life experiences.
Southern Asian and Indian
