To value living an "examined life" assumes that <u>"the truth lies within each of us".</u>
In my opinion living an examined life has diverse implications for every person:
For Cicero the examined life was an existence established in honesty and serving people in general.
For Socrates the examined life was the achievement of shrewdness and scholarly quietude.
For Fyodor Dostoyevsky the examined life implied the flexibility of the human spirit against malicious, torment, hardship and wretchedness.
For Seneca the examined life was to have an important objective and endeavor to consummate one's character.
I believe the answer is: <span>generativity vs. stagnation
Generativity in this context refers to the act leaving your mark in society by giving it some sort of contribution for the collective goods. Stagnation on the other hand, tend to be chosen by people who already content with what they have (or too afraid to fail for some)
</span>
According to the social contract theory and the declaration of independence, the people can stand up for their and others' rights in front of the supreme court when the government infringes on their rights.
<h3>When does the government infringe upon the rights of the people?</h3>
The government tries to make efforts in order to infringe upon the rights of the citizens in order to get more powers and make decisions that will impact the growth and development of the nation.
Therefore, it is important for the citizens to be aware of their rights and stop the tyranny of the government.
Learn more about rights here:
brainly.com/question/11254636
#SPJ4
The correct answer is irony
Sarcasm and Irony are ways of expressing a statement with a connotative meaning, that is, figurative.
Irony, on the other hand, means “asking by pretending not to know the answer”, “disguise” or “concealment”. The curious thing is that this word has been used, in the past, to refer to ignorance or ignorance about something.
Since the Aristotelian period, sarcasm and irony were already recorded in the speeches. The philosopher Aristotle used these artifices of language when pretending not to understand the idea expressed by the interlocutor, confronting him until he came to a contradiction in speech.
The grammar explains sarcasm and irony as figures of speech used outside their real meaning, which express a tone of debauchery. The difference between sarcasm and irony is that while the first is said in a malicious and harsh tone, the second is a contradictory phrase that generally has a sense of humor.
The government or supreme leader
