Answer:
The elasticity of supply for hot cocoa is 1.43.
(D) Supply in the market for coffee is less elastic than supply in the market for hot cocoa
Explanation:
Using the midpoint formula,
Elasticity of supply for hot cocoa = (change in quantity supplied/average quantity supplied) ÷ (change in price/average price)
change in quantity supplied = 101 - 31 = 70
average quantity supplied = (101+31)/2 = 66
70/66 = 1.06
change in price = 9.75 - 4.5 = 5.25
average price = (9.75+4.5)/2 = 7.125
5.25/7.125 = 0.74
Elasticity of supply for hot cocoa = 1.06 ÷ 0.74 = 1.43. The supply for hot cocoa is elastic because the elasticity of supply is greater than 1.
Elasticity of supply for coffee = (73 - 31)/(73+31)/2 ÷ 0.74 = 42/52 ÷ 0.74 = 0.81 ÷ 0.74 = 1.09. The supply for coffee is elastic because the elasticity of supply is greater than 1.
However, supply in the market for coffee is less elastic than supply in the market for hot cocoa because the elasticity of supply for coffee is less than that of hot coffee.
Yes, hovering over customers can make them feel uncomfortable in, for example, having a conversation because of another set of ears listening and constantly being interrupted
The answer is <span>Conflict theorist
</span><span>Conflict theorist Claims that every members in society will have to experiences continous conflict toward one another because of the competition to obtain limited amount of resources.
They tend to see that the majority of members in society will always be dominated/controlled by smaller amount of people that control the largest amount of resources.</span>
I think now I’m present day that money is now being transferred online and email services I think cash for no longer be used in the future because the rise of technology and how everyone is now getting so used to it and depending on tech
It would be positive it would be more clear to people and for the younger generation to learn about but for the older generation it would be much harder and would be a negative affect on them since they didn’t use technology in their days and a lot of people are still used to cash
Team bonding through the subjugation of junior members is not valid. Junior members should be encouraged by the senior members to strive for the team, not belittled or humiliated in the process. Different people assume comradery in different ways, some through degradation or laughter, and others through positivity and cohesiveness, but subjugation and humiliation should never be a factor when building teams, especially in today’s society since we live in such a diverse culture in this country. If an organization relied on humiliating banter in order to form a collective unit, then it shows that the organization is less cohesive and reflects poor management and leadership skills within the organization.
