In assessing the internal validity of an intervention, we try to determine if certain changes cause certain outcomes. It is relevant in studies that try to establish casual relationship. While in observational or descriptive studies, it is not that relevant. It is also possible to have internal validity in a study and not have construct validity. Example, imagine a study where you are looking at the effects of a new computerized tutoring program on math performance in first grade students.
Based on the audio and other cues such as the age of the speaker, the activity that is not mentioned is that the speaker <u>Shaves</u>.
The audio talks about how the speaker:
- Brushed their teeth
- Got dressed for school
- Left for school
The audio made no mention of the speaker shaving in the morning which makes sense because the speaker sounded quite young.
In conclusion, the speaker did not shave in the morning.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/11847855. </em>
<span>This is not unusual because at 9 she's already either in 3rd or 4th grade, has fairly extensive knowledge, and is no longer in a selfish phase of mental development. At age 9 you can perceive emotions from other people especially ones you are close to. How the other person shows that emotion determines how perceptive the child will be, but it doesn't have to be blatant for her to understand how you feel.</span>
Canada’s investment in human capital is high
Answer:
north korea is protected by the soviet union, and south korea is protected by the u.s. when the cold war happened between the u.s. and the soviet union, obviously the same sort of tensions would happen between north korea and south korea
