The answer is A. A third-person omniscient narrator can see all the characters' actions and know their thoughts, while a third-person limited narrator has insight into only one character.
Explanation:
In a narrative such as a novel, there can be different points of view, which are related to the type of narrator. One of the narrators more commonly used is the third-person narrator; this differs from others because it acts mainly as a spectator and it uses third-person pronouns (she, he, it, they). Moreover, this type of narrator can be limited, which means it only knows everything about one character including his/her thoughts or omniscient if the narrator knows the thoughts, feelings, and similar of all the characters in the story.
Answer:
The tragic heroine.
Explanation:
The tragic heroine archetype is the female protagonist who possesses a fatal flaw and makes wrongful judgments that led to her downfall, and even that of others around her.
The two excerpts from "The Royal House of Thebes" and "The Story of a Warrior Queen" show the tragic heroine in the characters of Antigone and Boadicea. Here, both women are shown them acting in their best interests but at the same time, also resulted in the death or suffering of their near ones. Boadicea takes her life and also that of her daughters while Antigone's act of going against the king to bury her brother led to the suffering of her sister Ismene too.
Thus, the correct answer is the tragic heroine.
<em>Although no paragraph is offered, the description of the nightmarish nightmare might be frightful, spooky, and frightening, making one fearful.</em>
Answer:
What happened in 2016 that now seems to have important ramifications for the replacement of Justice Ginsburg is that "Justice Ginsburg criticized Donald Trump in several interviews. She went ahead to call Trump a "faker". She said "He is a faker,"..."He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego..." Her statements were known to be against the codes of Supreme Court.
Explanation:
In 2016, Ginsburg blasted Trump. She was not in support of Trump's presidential pursuit. She kept opposing and speaking against Trump.
As a Justice of the Supreme Court, she was not meant to publicly show her support for or resentment against any candidate. But she was seen to have gone too far. So, such action made it an important ramification for her replacement.
A Taxpayer should have an accountant if they don't know the laws
