A human life is so valuable that no single price should be placed on it. The effect on this stance on bioethical issues however, is relative.
<h3>Relativity of Human value to Bioethical issues</h3>
- A person's stance on a bioethical issue can be based on which human life they value more, the person that will gain, or the one that will be affected.
- With abortion, one might argue that the value of the mother is higher than the baby's because not having to take care of a child will give her a better life.
- Designer babies might be more valuable because their lower rate of birth defects mean that they are tougher and less expensive to maintain.
- Stem cell research could save many lives so more value might be placed on these lives than the embryos affected.
In conclusion, a person can see another life as valuable yet have relative views on bioethical issues.
Find out more on stem cell research at brainly.com/question/5409171.
The answer is number 3 because the species has to adjust rapidly to change their environment.
The answer would be CODOMINANCE because codominance is when 2 genotypes show up at the same time on an object, where incomplete dominance is when 2 different genotypes combine and create a whole new phenotype
Answer:
because the mother sells are less for that kind of cuts so they don't regenerate and in a cut its easier because they are just in number for that cut
Explanation: