The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The basic guideline in writing a title that is being considered when the researcher should not use any unfamiliar and hard to understand words to avoid confusion to the readers is that the research uses a comprehensive and clear title to prevent any confusion.
The title has to clearly express the purpose of the paper and be so interesting that people indeed want to read it. The researcher has to have in mind that the title should include the tone of the writing and it has to include keywords to facilitate the search if someone tries to look for the paper on the internet. It is as well as important to discard any useless word or jargon, slangs, and unnecessary ideas that are not well suited in the title.
Answer:
A microwave oven is not a computer by itself, though it has a computer built-in to aid its task of microwaving. This is called an embedded computer, and the functionality is hard-coded to make it cheaper to build.
Explanation:
Answer:
Strabismus.
Explanation:
Strabimus is a condition that effects around 4% of small children. It is characterized by the inability to focus both eyes on an object.
I am so very sorry I can't help you.
Answer:
"To compare the leadership of different countries across Europe".
Explanation:
<u>In the mentioned section, the author talks about Roosevelt becoming president, only a day before Hitler gaining control of Germany. </u><u>This opening line shows how he is trying to put two different leadership methods against each other</u><u>. He continues explaining how dictatorship was getting stronger in East Asia and parts of Europe, including Spain, while America, Britain, and France were on sidelines, not willing to confront these changes. </u>T<u>he passage, therefore, talks about different relationships of the government, their leading styles, and how different it all was.</u>
The author does mention Hitler's promises and the Treaty of Versailles, but not the reactions to it. Additionally, he does not explicitly say all of this was the effect of WWI and directs leads to WWII. He simply talks about different governments, their leading styles, and differences.