1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Daniel [21]
3 years ago
8

Look at the map of Europe. Which of these areas practiced Christianity in 600

History
1 answer:
valina [46]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

i think it would be JERUSALEM PALESTINE

Explanation:

don't report me if im wrong

mark me Brainliest

You might be interested in
Describe the opposing attitudes toward Great Britain that colonists held prior to and during the Revolutionary War. How did diff
olchik [2.2K]

There were different attitudes in the colonies toward Great Britain prior to and during the Revolutionary War. Each group had reasons for supporting the side they did. Since you have asked several questions in this post, I will mainly focus on your first statement and briefly touch upon the others.There were people who believed we should remain loyal to Great Britain. These people believed that Great Britain had the right to run the colonies in any manner that they wanted. They believed that Great Britain took a risk in establishing and in running the colonies. This gave them the authority to do what they felt what was necessary in order to make them successful. These people also were concerned there would be chaos if Great Britain was defeated.Some people wanted to remain loyal to Great Britain for economic reasons. The colonists got many products from Great Britain that were not made in the colonies. Some people worked for the British government. These people would have lost their jobs if Great Britain was defeated.Other people wanted to remain loyal for religious reasons. The King of England was the head of the Anglican Church. These people felt they couldn’t disobey the King since he was the leader of the Church of England.The Native Americans and some slaves tended to be on the side of the British. The Native Americans didn’t trust the colonists and feared the colonists would take away their land. Some slaves supported the British because they were promised their freedom if Great Britain won the war.There were other people who believed we needed to be free from the rule of the British. They believed the British were violating the rights of the colonists. They felt the tax laws were illegal because the colonists had no representatives in Parliament that could vote on the taxes. They felt the British were trying to control them by preventing the colonists from moving to the new lands that we had just gained from France as a result of the French and Indian War. They were unhappy with the Proclamation of 1763 and with the Quartering Act. The Quartering Act required the colonists to provide housing for the British troops that were enforcing the unpopular Proclamation of 1763.More people began to feel the colonists should be free from the British rule after there were violent confrontations with the British. People became concerned after five colonists were killed in the Boston Massacre. After the Intolerable Acts were passed to punish the colonists for the Boston Tea Party, the colonists formed their own militias as they expected some fighting to occur. After the battles at Lexington and at Concord, during which both sides suffered casualties, many people believed it was only a matter of time before we would declare our independence. Throughout the war, these people believed we were fighting for our rights and to stop the abuses of the British government.Each group of people had various reasons for supporting the rule of the British or for joining the colonists in their fight for freedom


7 0
3 years ago
What is one way that historians can establish the authenticity of a primary source A by comparing
Helga [31]
Answer:

B. By comparing the source to other established sources from that time period

Explanation:

A source is considered as authentic when the source is genuine which means it does not copy other sources and also when this is accurate and has been not modify with biased purposes. In primary sources, which are first-hand account sources, this quality can be proven by historians and experts by analyzing whether the elements of the source fit with the time in which they were written and the possible author, which can be done by comparing the source being studied to sources that were created during the same period of time and that have been proven as authentic, as authentic sources written during the same time share common features. Therefore, one way in which historians can establish the authenticity of a primary source is by comparing the source to other established sources from that time period.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What makes christianity different from Islam and Judaism
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

Judaism and Islam simply do not recognize the divinity of Jesus. For this reason, the monotheism practiced by Judaism and Islam is different from the monotheism of Christianity. Christianity has a Trinitarian understanding of the one true God because of Jesus’ divinity that is not shared by Judaism and Islam. In fact, Islam would describe Christianity as a tri-theist religion, rather than a monotheistic religion.

Judaism is characterized by a belief in one transcendent God who revealed himself to Abraham, Moses, and the Hebrew prophets.

Followers of Islam are called Muslims. Muslims are monotheistic and worship one, all-knowing God, who in Arabic is known as Allah. Muslims are monotheistic and worship one, all-knowing God, who in Arabic is known as Allah.

Christians believe that Jesus Christ was the Son of God – fully human and fully divine – and that through believing in him and following his teachings they can inherit eternal life.

5 0
2 years ago
A presidential government is based on the relationship between which two branches of government
svetoff [14.1K]

A presidential government is based on the relationship between the legislative power and the executive.

The presidential system or presidential system is a form of government in which, once a Republic is constituted, the Constitution establishes a division of powers between the executive power, the legislative power, the judiciary, and the head of state, in addition to holding representation formally of the country, is also an active part of the executive power, as Head of Government, thus exercising a dual function, because he has the powers of the Government, being elected directly by the voters and not by Congress or Parliament.

The president is the body that holds the executive power, while the legislative power usually concentrates the congress, without prejudice to the powers that the president has in legislative matters.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me quick ASAP!!!!!!!!<br> With both of the questions
inn [45]
1. 30 people
2. 4 yards 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How has the US government used the Patriot Act to prevent terrorist attacks since September 11, 2001?
    8·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the Pure Food and Drug Act? to regulate the safety, labeling, and interstate shipment of food and medici
    12·1 answer
  • (Help please...)
    15·1 answer
  • Roits<br> What is one of the United Nations' primary goals?
    9·2 answers
  • Which question would be most appropriate to guide a scientific investigation?In the election of 1796, the Democratic-Republican
    6·1 answer
  • Did the Anti-Federalist or the Federalist protect the rights and welfare of the people most ?
    12·1 answer
  • Starting around 13,000 BCE (before common era) hunters and fishers
    12·1 answer
  • Why did many people leave farms and move to the cities in the 1800s?
    7·1 answer
  • Words:<br> How does the Constitution guard against tyranny (abuse of<br> power)?
    9·1 answer
  • I suck at history please help me
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!