1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
a_sh-v [17]
3 years ago
6

Explain how the boston tea party led to more tension between great britain and the colonist

History
1 answer:
DIA [1.3K]3 years ago
6 0
It was a reaction from the colonist for Great Britain taxing the colonies so much. It led to more tension because it was a straight forward act against Great Britain, and one that was slightly violet. It was showing Great Britain that the colonist were definitely fed up with how they were being traeted by the mother country.
You might be interested in
In Caddo society, the leader of the confederacy was known as __________.
vichka [17]

Answer: D, A xinesi

Explanation:

Just had the test and looked back at my answers and got it right.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. The work of James Cattell, Alfred Binet, and Walter Bingham contributed extensively to
irina1246 [14]

Answer: testing

Explanation:

Here's the complete question:

The work of James Cattell, Alfred Binet, and Walter Bingham contributed extensively to the emphasis of ......... in career counseling.

Career counseling simply means the advice and support that is is given to people by the career counselors which is vital in knowing the path to take in life.

James McKeen Cattell, is known for his use of mental testing to businesses,. education and industries. Alfred Binet, born invented the IQ test, while Walter Bingham created the Alpha and the Beta test and other aptitude tests for the Army.

3 0
3 years ago
1. How does the author characterize the
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:s the United States enters the 21st century, it stands unchallenged as the world’s economic leader, a remarkable turnaround from the 1980s when many Americans had doubts about U.S. “competitiveness.” Productivity growth—the engine of improvement in average living standards—has rebounded from a 25-year slump of a little more than 1 percent a year to roughly 2.5 percent since 1995, a gain few had predicted.

Economic engagement with the rest of the world has played a key part in the U.S. economic revival. Our relatively open borders, which permit most foreign goods to come in with a zero or low tariff, have helped keep inflation in check, allowing the Federal Reserve to let the good times roll without hiking up interest rates as quickly as it might otherwise have done. Indeed, the influx of funds from abroad during the Asian financial crisis kept interest rates low and thereby encouraged a continued boom in investment and consumption, which more than offset any decline in American exports to Asia. Even so, during the 1990s, exports accounted for almost a quarter of the growth of output (though just 12 percent of U.S. gross domestic product at the end of the decade).

Yet as the new century dawns, America’s increasing economic interdependence with the rest of the world, known loosely as “globalization,” has come under attack. Much of the criticism is aimed at two international institutions that the United States helped create and lead: the International Monetary Fund, launched after World War II to provide emergency loans to countries with temporary balance-of-payments problems, and the World Trade Organization, created in 1995 during the last round of world trade negotiations, primarily to help settle trade disputes among countries.

The attacks on both institutions are varied and often inconsistent. But they clearly have taken their toll. For all practical purposes, the IMF is not likely to have its resources augmented any time soon by Congress (and thus by other national governments). Meanwhile, the failure of the WTO meetings in Seattle last December to produce even a roadmap for future trade negotiations—coupled with the protests that soiled the proceedings—has thrown a wrench into plans to reduce remaining barriers to world trade and investment.

For better or worse, it is now up to the United States, as it has been since World War II, to help shape the future of both organizations and arguably the course of the global economy. A broad consensus appears to exist here and elsewhere that governments should strive to improve the stability of the world economy and to advance living standards. But the consensus breaks down over how to do so. As the United States prepares to pick a new president and a new Congress, citizens and policymakers should be asking how best to promote stability and growth in the years ahead.

Unilateralism

6 0
3 years ago
How did Rames II’s armies help him build a great empire?
Evgesh-ka [11]

Answer: They helped him by building the empires in the way that he meant it to be built.

3 0
3 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST Vaudeville shows...?
ziro4ka [17]
I think the answer is c
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What court was the brown vs board of education case held?
    9·1 answer
  • What is one thing the first and second industrial revolutions have in common
    10·2 answers
  • NEED HELP ASAP. I put this question for 50 points. PLEASE HELP ME.
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement best explains the Three-Fifths Compromise?
    13·1 answer
  • Help! Picture is attached.
    7·1 answer
  • The following excerpt is from a speech by Abraham Lincoln. Which line implies that Lincoln tried to convince Southerners that th
    7·2 answers
  • What is similar between The Algonquin and Anasazi
    13·1 answer
  • Which advantage did the second location of San Juan Bautista Mission have over its first location
    7·2 answers
  • What has The Epic of Gilgamesh revealed to archaeologists about
    10·1 answer
  • What did Historian Robert E. Corlew say about the Tennessee Constitution?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!