1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MatroZZZ [7]
4 years ago
12

Seven plus the product of two numbers

Mathematics
1 answer:
IceJOKER [234]4 years ago
6 0

Step-by-step explanation:

this should show

7+ (xy)=

You might be interested in
What is the slope intercept ?
Olegator [25]

Answer:

y=mx+b

Step-by-step explanation:

that is the equation

4 0
3 years ago
Let F⃗ =2(x+y)i⃗ +8sin(y)j⃗ .
Alik [6]

Answer:

-42

Step-by-step explanation:

The objective is to find the line integral of F around the perimeter of the rectangle with corners (4,0), (4,3), (−3,3), (−3,0), traversed in that order.

We will use <em>the Green's Theorem </em>to evaluate this integral. The rectangle is presented below.

We have that

           F(x,y) = 2(x+y)i + 8j \sin y = \langle 2(x+y), 8\sin y \rangle

Therefore,

                  P(x,y) = 2(x+y) \quad \wedge \quad Q(x,y) = 8\sin y

Let's calculate the needed partial derivatives.

                              P_y = \frac{\partial P}{\partial y} (x,y) = (2(x+y))'_y = 2\\Q_x =\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} (x,y) = (8\sin y)'_x = 0

Thus,

                                    Q_x -P_y = 0 -2 = - 2

Now, by the Green's theorem, we have

\oint_C F \,dr = \iint_D (Q_x-P_y)\,dA = \int \limits_{-3}^{4} \int \limits_{0}^{3} (-2)\,dy\, dx \\ \\\phantom{\oint_C F \,dr = \iint_D (Q_x-P_y)\,dA}= \int \limits_{-3}^{4} (-2y) \Big|_{0}^{3} \; dx\\ \phantom{\oint_C F \,dr = \iint_D (Q_x-P_y)\,dA}= \int \limits_{-3}^{4} (-6)\; dx = -6x  \Big|_{-3}^{4} = -42

4 0
3 years ago
Please, with work, find the prime factorization of 60 and 140?
Brrunno [24]
Prime Factors of 60:   2,3, and 5
Prime Factors of 140:  2,5 and 7
All mental math no work needed.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help on this pleasee​
g100num [7]

Answer:

slope is 6/0 which is undefined

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Premier Bank is planning to have a new building constructed. They would like the length of the building to be 40 feet longer tha
MaRussiya [10]

Let L, W, F, H, P represent, respectively, the length, width, number of floors, height, and perimeter of the building. Here are some equations that model the given information.

  • L = W + 40
  • H = 12×F
  • foundation cost = 10×L×W
  • cost of floors = 35000×F
  • total cost = foundation cost + cost of floors
  • total cost = 1,180,000
  • P = 2×(L+W)
  • P = 3×H

We can rewrite these into a system of equations involving L, W, F.

Let's look first at the relation between the perimeter and height. The two versions of perimeter are equal to each other, so we have (after substituting for H) ...

... 3H = 2(L+W)

... 3(12F) = 2((W +40) +W) . . . . substitute for H and L

... 36F = 4W +80 . . . . . . . . . . . simplify

... 9F = W +20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . divide by 4

Now, we can look at the cost equations.

... 1180000 = 35000F + 10W(W+40) . . . . . substitute for the various cost terms and for L

... 118000 = 3500F +W² +40W . . . . . . . . . divide by 10

The two simplified equations in W and F are ...

  • 9F = W +20
  • 3500F = 118000 -40W -W²

You can solve the first for F and substitute for F in the second. Then you have a quadratic equation in W that can be solved by the usual methods. (Likely, the quadratic formula would be the best choice.) Here, we have elected to let a graphing calculator show the two solutions. One solution has negative dimensions, so is clearly infeasible.

There is one (nearly feasible) solution:

... W ≈ 180.788

... F ≈ 22.31

There is no combination of floor dimensions and integral numbers of floors that will match <em>all</em> of the problem requirements.

_____

A solution that comes about as close as possible is ...

  • length = 221 ft
  • width = 181 ft
  • perimeter = 804 ft
  • # of floors = 22
  • height = 264 ft . . . . . (3×height = 792 ft vs. 804 ft)
  • cost = $1,170,010 . . . (vs. 1,180,000)

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • ms shah grades 3402 math problems during 5th period this is 54% of the total number of problems she need to grade what is the to
    9·1 answer
  • Help with geometry questions 45 points
    14·1 answer
  • The tax rate on Jerome Jame's $112,000 vacation home is 25 mills. The property is assessed at full value. How much will Jerome p
    7·2 answers
  • Using the tables above find the mean, median, mode, and range of the prices of Felix's and Tyler's books Felix Price ($) Number
    12·1 answer
  • $4.30 markup, 40% discount, 6% tax
    12·1 answer
  • What is the pattern as the exponents decrease?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the answer for3+2x=-6x+4
    5·1 answer
  • Boht agyi yaade<br><br>hmm<br><br>:)​
    10·2 answers
  • n employee makes ​$161 per hour but is getting a ​45% increase. What is his new wage per hour to the nearest​ cent?
    12·1 answer
  • Pina has two equations that she found to be valuable models for her research. She thinks that if she can find the solution of th
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!