1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fenix001 [56]
3 years ago
12

Betty is a consultant and operates a sole proprietorship providing advisory services. In July of 2019, Betty traveled from Minne

apolis to Munich, Germany to meet with a client. She spent a total of 15 days in Germany. 11 of the days were devoted to business (including travel days), holding meetings with her client and providing advisory services. Taking advantage of being abroad, Betty spent the other 4 days site seeing around Munich. Betty incurred the following expenses on her trip: • Airfare $1,900 • Hotel $2,100 ($140/night) • Meals $1,125 ($75/day) • Rental Car $450 ($30/Day) How much of the above expenses qualify as deductible travel expenses?
Business
1 answer:
babymother [125]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:Total deductible expenses= 2695+1900=4595

All of airfare expense will be deductible as travel expense, whereas Hotel, Meals and car are on a per day basis so 11/15 of the costs will be deductible.

Explanation:

1) Airfare: All the cost of Airfare qualify as deductible travel expenses as she had to go and comeback as part of a business trip and her spending extra days in Munich don't affect the travel cost or airfare. So we can expense $1900.

2) Hotel, Meals and Rental car: All of these costs are related to the number of days that Betty spent in Munich so only 11 of the 15 days worth of cost can be expensed as deductible

(140+75+30)*(11)= 2695

Airfare              =1900

Total deductible expenses= 2695+1900=4595

You might be interested in
If the united states government raises the income taxes on the wealthiest americans, while increasing welfare payments to the po
mel-nik [20]

Efficiency will undoubtedly suffer if the US government increases assistance payments to the poorest Americans while raising income taxes on the wealthiest Americans and an increase in inequality.

<h3>What will happen if the U.S. raises taxes on the wealthiest Americans?</h3>

Every society must choose between equality and productivity. If the US government increases assistance payments to the poorest Americans while raising income taxes on the wealthiest Americans, the outcome will probably be a decline and increased inequality in the United States.

To know more about it, visit:

brainly.com/question/14366514

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
A coal mine cost $ 1 comma 001 comma 000and is estimated to hold 57 comma 000tons of coal. There is no residual value. During th
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

Depletion expenses for the first year is $210736.840

Explanation:

Depletion expenses= (Cost of coal mine - residual value) / Total tons of coal * tons extracted

=(1,001,000 - $0) / 57,000 tons * 12,000 tons

=$210736.8421

=$210736.840

6 0
3 years ago
James borrows $300,000 for a home from Bank A. Bank A resells the right to collect on that loan to Bank B. Bank B securitizes th
sattari [20]

Answer:

D) AIG

Explanation:

We went back in time to 2008 and we are in the middle of the subprime mortgage crisis. This is an example of how mortgage backed securities and collateralized debt obligations worked.

The problem with this scenario is that in order for every company involved to be able to make a profit, the mortgages' interest rates skyrocketed which made it harder for families to pay back their loans. This eventually made the families lose their houses and that was the end to the housing bubble and the whole economy collapsed.

6 0
3 years ago
The government is trying to maintain the infrastructure of the country, provide Social Security benefits to citizens, and regula
likoan [24]

The government will be able to improve the road system, encouraging more people to drive on vacations. Social Security benefits will provide income for the elderly and disabled, allowing them to spend money, thus boosting the economy. Airline security might be slightly improved because of the ability to hire, but there will not be enough money to provide the latest equipment.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Instructions: Please make sure that you show all your work when solving the problems. Feel free to make any assumptions whenever
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

Explanation:

From the given information:

The current price = \dfrac{Dividend(D_o) \times (1+ Growth  \ rate) }{\text{Cost of capital -Growth rate}}

15 = \dfrac{0.50 \times (1+ Growth rate)}{8\%-Growth rate}

15 \times (8 -Growth \  rate) = 0.50 +(0.50 \times growth  \  rate)

1.20 - (15 \times Growth \ rate) = 0.50 + (0.50 \times growth \ rate)

0.70 = (15 \times growth  \ rate) \\ \\ Growth  \ rate = \dfrac{0.70}{15.50} \\ \\ Growth  \ rate = 0.04516 \\ \\ Growth  \ rate \simeq 4.52\% \\ \\

2. The value of the stock  

Calculate the earnings at the end of  5 years:

Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend \  payout  \ ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%} \\ \\ = \$1.42857

Earnings (E_5) year \  5  = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \  5  = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5  = \$2.51763

Terminal value year 5 = \dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}

=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+0.04516)}{8\%-0.04516}

=$75.526

Discount all potential future cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 +Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no\ of\ years} }

+ \dfrac{Terminal\ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years}} \Bigg)

\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}}  + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$75.526}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg )

\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$75.526}{1.4693} \bigg)

=$ 54.1945

As a result, the analysts value the stock at $54.20, which is below their own estimates.

3. The value of the stock  

Calculate the earnings at the end of  5 years:

Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend payout ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%}\\ \\ = \$1.42857

Earnings (E_5) year  \ 5  = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year  \ 5  = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \  5  = \$2.51763 \\ \\

Terminal value year 5 =\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)\times dividend \ payout \ ratio}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}

=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+ 7 \%) \times 20\%}{8\%-7\%}

=$53.8773

Discount all potential cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 + Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no \ of\ years} }+ \dfrac{Terminal \ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years }}   \bigg)

\implies \bigg( \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}}  + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$53.8773}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg)

\implies \bigg (\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$53.8773}{1.4693} \bigg)

=$39.460

As a result, the price is $39.460, and the other strategy would raise the value of the shareholders. Not this one, since paying a 100% dividend would result in a price of $54.20, which is higher than the current price.

Notice that the third question depicts the situation after 5 years, but the final decision will be the same since we are discounting in current terms. If compounding is used, the future value over 5 years is just the same as the first choice, which is the better option.

The presumption in the second portion is that after 5 years, the steady growth rate would be the same as measured in the first part (1).

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 6. In 1883, ____________ divided the nation into the four time zones still used today. a. the major railroad companies b. the fe
    12·1 answer
  • Caroline has saved $100,000 for her retirement. She earned 4 percent interest on that money during the year 2013. If the inflati
    12·1 answer
  • The Baldrige Award aims to: (I) publicize successful quality programs. (II) recognize quality achievements of U.S. companies. (I
    14·1 answer
  • Denzel Brooks opens a Web consulting business called Venture Consultants and completes the following transactions in March.
    5·1 answer
  • The next dividend payment by Savitz, Inc., will be $2.34 per share. The dividends are anticipated to maintain a growth rate of 4
    7·1 answer
  • A mutual fund had NAV per share of $19.00 on January 1, 2016. On December 31 of the same year, the fund's NAV was $19.14. Income
    11·1 answer
  • What is one of the SMART guidelines that help develop objectives?
    6·2 answers
  • The formula for accounts receivable turnover is computed as _____ divided by average accounts receivable, net.
    13·1 answer
  • Financial information for BDS Enterprises for the year-ended December 31, 20xx, was gathered from an accounting intern, who has
    13·1 answer
  • Which form of feasibility incorporates both physical and mental integration of the design work system during job completion
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!