This answer is True. But frequent devastating floods, largely due to the elevated river bed in its lower course, have also earned it the distinction "China's Sorrow". The Yellow River is indicative of the problems affecting many of China's rivers.
Answer:
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "C) is allowed to make rules and laws which are technically unconstitutional." Chile, Peru, and Venezuela are each considered unitary governments. A main characteristic of a unitary government is that it is allowed to make rules and laws which are technically unconstitutional.
Explanation:
The negative effects of considering political leanings when selecting Supreme Court Justices include:
- The risk of bias
- The possibility of selecting an unqualified an inexperienced person
<h3>What are political leanings?</h3>
In the U.S., some people belong to the conservative political group while others belong to the liberal or democratic group.
It is wrong to select a Supreme Court Justice on any of these basis because the emotion is a major player that can lead to the wrong choices.
In such cases, the qualifications of the candidates might be overlooked due to bias.
Learn more about political leanings here:
brainly.com/question/1470181
#SPJ1
she was a leader in the helping of lousi and clark expedition .
It largely depends on what city state we are talking about. People at this time didn't identify as Greeks they were Thebans, Ionians, Athenians, Thracians and so on.
Syracuse and Corinth had well developed democratic systems and many of the other city states had democratic components. Even the militaristic duel monarchy of the Spartans had some democracy. The Spartan Ephors were elected and had enough power to exile kings if desired. Let's look at the most commonly cited city state though, Athens.
Athenians utilized a direct democracy compared to Roman republic and everything would be voted upon. Who would lead the armies, what kind of trade arrangements, who the diplomatic envoys would be; pretty much everything. Romans elected specific individuals to handle regional business like a representative of the people, the senators and provincial governors.
Athens was slightly more equal then the Roman system. Under the Athenian law all free citizens technically had equal rights in the government. In Rome the Patricians, Equestrians and Plebeians had strictly defined roles both legally and legislatively.
The reverse of the above point were the inclusiveness of the two systems. Athens had draconian regulations on who qualified as a free member of the city state. Rome comparatively welcomed a large swath of people and actively sought to latinize the frontiers.
Rome had two consistent political parties. Politics would be marked by conflict between the Conservatives and the Populares. Athens comparatively had many political blocks that were constantly evolving and changing beliefs.
The most distinct difference between the system is probably the adaptability of them though. The Roman system was extremely complex, but was constantly changing and adapting to meet the changing times. The Athenian system would become bogged down as time progressed and would essentially become little more then another oligarchy towards its end.
