Answer:
take the case to the United States Supreme Court
Explanation:
From the scenario given, it can be inferred that the case has been decided at the court of the first instance, which is the lower court.
Also, the court has been decided at the first appellate court, which is the court of appeals. Then If Wag's lawyer wants to appeal this decision, (, the decision of the court of appeal) he will " take the case to the United States Supreme Court."
This is because it is the Supreme Court that has jurisdiction over the appeal courts.
Note: since it is not specified that the case is exclusive of the state laws, then it is assumed that the automobile accident, in this case, involved federal laws.
Hence, the next step is to "take the case to the United States Supreme Court"
Comparing the untouched united states during the time before it was settled by Europeans to modern america
Texas is a state with a plural executive system, with charisma being a characteristic that helps in persuasion and influence for acceptance of a governor's ideas.
<h3 /><h3>What is a plural executive system?</h3>
It corresponds to a limitation of the governor's power, being the executive power of the state distributed among the other government officials, who together will make important decisions for the administration of public interests.
Therefore, in a plural executive system, charisma is a more useful feature than in a centralized executive system, where there is less flexibility and shared responsibility for decisions.
Find out more about plural executive system here:
brainly.com/question/3364796
#SPJ1
I believe it is equality. I am not sure in what context this is asking, but I am pretty sure it is equality.
<span>The Hundred Years' War was a conflict between </span>England and France which was caused from a territorial dispute. Hope this helps.