A restaurant is a place where <u>food and drinks</u> are prepared and served to clients. Meals are often served and consumed on-site, however many restaurants also provide take-out and food delivery services.
Alejandro is a<u> bartender</u> and Mei is a<u> Chef</u>.
<h2 /><h2>The reasons for the selection of their Job position:</h2>
<h3>Alejandro:
</h3>
- Alejandro works in a restaurant at night.
- His work is preparing drinks for customers.
- He serves drinks to those <u>sitting nearby</u>, but he also prepares drinks for <u>waiters to distribute</u> to guests around the restaurant.
- Alejandro is almost certainly a bartender.
<h3>Mei:
</h3>
- Mei works long hours as a waitress in a restaurant.
- She creates the restaurant's menu, manages kitchen employees, and prepares food.
- Mei is probably a chef or a cook.
For more information about the related question, refer below:
brainly.com/question/24531289
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
Article 163(a) enables with all interest charged as well as accumulated throughout the obtainable year as rationale. On something like a duty. Not from having to stand, area 163(h)(1) for individuals continues to refuse an inference.
Definitely competent house involvement is not really a person under Segment 163(h)(2)(D). In Section 163(h)(3)(a) characterizes skilled optimism even though paid or charged interest. Recovering for a guaranteeing responsibility or house price responsibility guaranteed by taxable year Each consumer's competent going to dwell.
Even though optimism for both the supply chain responsibility under sentence 163(h)(3), a public servant may deduct (B) Accrued interest on 1,000,000 of the 1200,000 bond that used highlight the entire living in 2009 Agreement. In getting a competent living situation, the 1200,000 responsibility has been obtained Taxpayer as well as living agreements have been secured. In the this way: 1,000,000 is obligatory Obtained under 163(h)(3) as a supply chain obligation (B).
Two exceptions to the special passive activity rule for real estate activities provide the whole or partial offset of real estate rental losses against active or portfolio income, even when the business is otherwise regarded as a passive activity.
<h3>Which rules regarding passive activities for rental revenue are exceptions?</h3>
- You have a stake in the yearly commerce or economic activities.
- During the current tax year or at least 2 of the 5 tax years prior, the rental property was utilized primarily in that trade or company.
<h3>Only real estate is subject to passive loss restrictions, right?</h3>
Generally speaking, the following actions can result in passive losses (and income): leasing of equipment. Rental property (though there are some exceptions) a farm or a sole proprietorship in which the taxpayer has no substantial interest.
<h3>How can passive income be balanced?</h3>
Selling off your rental properties will help you make up for your passive losses. You don't actually have to sell the property that's causing the losses to balance them effectively. Any passive income will be offset by losses.
Learn more about special passive activity rule: brainly.com/question/28137310
#SPJ4
Answer: Yes. AudioCable should buy a new equipment
Explanation:
Audiocables Inc. without new equipment:
Selling price: $1.40
Variable cost: $0.50
Fixed cost: $14,000
Sales: 30000 units
Total cost = Fixed cost + Variable cost
= $14000 + ($0.50 × 30000)
= $14000 + $15000
= $29000
Revenue = Sales × Selling price
= 30000 × $1.40
= $42000
Profit = Revenue - Total Cost
= $42000 - $29000
= $13000
Audiocables Inc. with new equipment:
Selling price: $1.40
Variable cost: $0.60
Fixed cost: $14,000 + $6000 = $20000
Sales: 50000 units
Total cost = Fixed cost + Variable cost
= $20000 + ($0.60 × 50000)
= $20000 + $30000
= $50000
Revenue = Sales × Selling price
= 50000 × $1.40
= $70000
Profit = Revenue - Total Cost
= $70000 - $50000
= $20000
From the calculations made, AudioCable buy a new equipment as profit generated is more.
Answer:
$3,800
Explanation:
The computation of the after-tax benefit is shown below:
= Annual dinner club membership cost - annual dinner club membership cost × her marginal tax rate
= $5,000 - $5,000 × 24%
= $5,000 - $1,200
= $3,800
We simply deduct her tax expense from the annual dinner club membership cost so that the accurate amount can come.
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
