Answer:
C. $3,375
Explanation:
Calculation for the value of this stock on the company's balance sheet on December 31
Stock value= 225 shares* $15 per share
Stock value=$3,375
Therefore the value of this stock on the company's balance sheet on December 31 will be $3,375
Answer:
Equipment, credit, $229,100
Explanation:
we record the entry when we purchase the equipment is
we debit the equipment, and credit the cash/accounts payable depending on whether we paid the cash or purchased the equipment on account.
We debit the equipment because equipment is our asset, and when asset goes up we debit them. We credit the cash because again cash is our asset and when asset goes down we credit them.
Now at the time of disposal, we want to remove the asset from our balance sheet. Equipment is disposed now. In other words, equipment is our asset, and disposing the equipment means asset goes down, and we show this effect by credit the equipment.
Answer:
perfectly price discriminating.
Explanation:
here are the options to this question :
not maximizing its profit.
imperfectly price discriminating.
not price discriminating.
perfectly price discriminating.
perfect price discrimination also known as first-degree discrimination is when a seller sells his product at the maximum possible price for each unit consumed. Due to the price variance, the seller captures all available consumer surplus.
A monopoly is when there is only one firm operating in an industry.
The elements that would have to be in place for a contract to be unconscionable would be that
- They were under pressure
- They were misled
- They did not have the right information
<h3>What is meant by a contract?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the fact that two people or more have agreed to do business with themselves.
In order to be a contract, one person would have to create a bargain and the other would be the one that would agree to the terms.
It is unconscionable at the time when the contract is done and the person or one of the parties is found not to have been able to make the contract agreement at their right frame of mind. In this case, the law has the power to protect this party.
Hence they would have to rule in his favor. Therefore to be unconscionable, a contract would have to have been misled, have been made under duress and without the adequate information.
Read more on contracts here:
brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1
