I added a picture of a badly-drawn cross as an example to help me explain. Let's say h is the recessive allele, in this case, that would cause a recessive condition. The heterozygous Hh parent is the carrier and they are being crossed with a homozygous dominant HH parent.
As you can see, all of the children are either homozygous dominants HH or heterozygous carriers Hh. None of the children can be homozygous recessive hh because there is not a recessive allele h to inherit from the other parent. Because H is dominant over h, the recessive condition won't be displayed.
I believe the answer is: Examining age at first arrest as a predictor of adult criminal history.
Regardless of their actions, prisoners still had the same right as any legal citizens, which mean they cannot be forced to become a subject of research that might compromise either their psychological or physical well being. Examining age usually can be done simply by reading the prisoners' document.
William M. "Boss" Tweed of Tammany Hall would most support a patronage system.
William Magear "Boss" Tweed was an American politician. During the 19th century, he was the political boss of Tammany Hall, an influential party apparatus for the New York Democratic Party.
William M. Tweed was convicted of stealing between $ 25 million and $ 45 million from New York taxpayers through corruption. In later estimates of the corruption that Tweed was behind, the sum was in fact around 200 million USD.
Learn more in brainly.com/question/3794195
Answer:
the system is a statwide network of 11