Which of the following amendments in the constitution do both Justice Fortas and Justice Black refer to?

English

2 answers:

77julia77 [94]3 years ago

6 0

The correct answer is B) the fourteenth.

The amendments in the constitution that both Justice Fortas and Justice Black referred to was the fourteenth.

We are referring to the Court Case Tinker v. Des Moines Independence Community School District 21, of 1968, that was decided on February 24, 1969, where three students were that wore black bands in protest of the Vietnam War were suspended from school. Justice Fortas and Justice Black referred to the fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution to back their decision.

The other options of the question were A) the twelfth. C) the third. D) the fifth.

Elis [28]3 years ago

5 0

The fourteenth amendment

hope this helps somehow

You might be interested in

Hello humans of the world

elixir [45]

I think the answer is hello perfect took me ages to work out

7 0

3 years ago

Kindly give a sentence with the word absence. Thank you so much! x

Temka [501]

The absence of my noisy baby brother was unusually relaxing. :)
I hope this helped.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is something in your life that you need to put more effort into? how can you start?

Katena32 [7]

Your goals and your dreams are the most important things you have to put your effort into, to start you have to reach your inner peace with yourself, believe in it, avoid the distractions and focus on yourself, your dreams and your goals in life so then you can be the person you’ve always wanted to be.

4 0

3 years ago

What are the two main disadvantages of the means of transport used today?

aliina [53]

Answer: Polluting the air. And gas leaks in cars.

Explanation: The gas that comes out of cars had deadly chemicals that are not good for the environment. To me gas leak's are the worst because it just settles into the ground until what do you know the whole surrounding area is on fire.

3 0

3 years ago

QUESTION: How effective is the argument? How does Elizabeth Warren use valid and sufficient

bulgar [2K]

Answer:

The argument is very effective. Elizabeth Warren uses valid and sufficient evidence by specifying numerous ways by which the act will put an end to discrimination while preserving justified differences in pay.

Explanation:

Two pieces of quoted evidence from "Why Equal Pay is Worth Fighting For" by Senator Elizabeth Warren dated April 17, 2014, supports the effectiveness of the answer. Warren says:

"The effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long-lasting. Today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. Pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . . . For middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on Mom's salary as they do on Dad's, if not more. Women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat."

"Employers can still pay different workers different salaries based on factors like skill, performance, expertise, seniority, and so forth—the Paycheck Fairness Act doesn't touch any of that."

Throughout the argument, Warren has pointed out the reasons and effects of this pay discrimination based on gender. She has also explained how employers should and can pay the employees various wages based on certain justified factors and not gender.

8 0

3 years ago