What effects did the Declaration of Independence have on the revolutionary war?

1 answer:

6 0

The declaration was a laundry list of affronts to the colonies by King George III, wherein Jefferson et.al. argued that since the monarchy did not treat the colonists like other Britons, the colonists had the right to form their own sovereign nation. It was also intended to justify this action to other monarchies to prevent them from helping Britain retain the colonies under the doctrine of Intervention. So it helped to justify the war domestically and internationally.

You might be interested in

Long working hours, No Minimum Wage, and unsafe working conditions lead to the formation of

frosja888 [35]

I think the answer is B

8 0

4 years ago

Main reason for funding the colonies?

professor190 [17]

POLITICAL REASONS: ENCOURAGEMENT FROM RULERS British monarchs encouraged the development of colonies as new sources of wealth and power. They granted charters to groups of businessmen, like the Virginia Company, who offered to help colonists settle in the “New World.” Economic - Concerns money and wealth

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How is the method of prediction similar among<br> volcanoes , earthquakes, flooding, and tsunamis.

OLga [1]

Answer:

Vibrations mostly

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

You are the leader of a great superpower. To keep the balance of power in nation's favor, you want to gain as many allies as pos

a_sh-v [17]

<span>1. How will you get these non-aligned (uncommitted) nations on your side????
This can be done many ways, my favorite is by using trade and economic ties. This is done by trading resources that the non-aligned nations might want or need.

2. How might actions affect your country? The other superpower?
These trade actions would increase trade within my country and the other nations. This would create an increase in jobs, money, and overall wellbeing.

3. How might being caught in a struggle between superpowers affect a developing nation?
Joining one specific side could result in benefits from that superpower, but the other superpower might cut off all diplomatic relationships. This could result in a cut of needed or wanted resources, or even war.

</span>

4 0

3 years ago

If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:

DIA [1.3K]

Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:

A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.

<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>

This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.

In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.

Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564

#SPJ1

8 0

2 years ago