Answer:
<h3>1.False</h3><h3>2.True</h3>
Hope it helps ☺️
The correct answers are 2) they both became wealthy and successful, 3) they both helped better the lifestyle of others, and 4) they both developed products that filled a human need or needs.
<em>Bill Gates and Henry Ford are similar in that they both became wealthy and successful, they both helped better the lifestyle of others, and they both developed products that filled a human need or needs.
</em>
One of the most renown entrepreneurs and businessman of America are Bill Gates and Henry Ford. Both men were visionaries that lived before their times and were capable of developing products that changed the life of humanity forever. Henry Ford is the father of automobile manufacturing with his production line on the model “T”. Bill Gates revolutionized the world with his Apple company and following software inventions that united the world through communications. So it is correct to say that Bill Gates and Henry Ford are similar in that they both became wealthy and successful, they both helped better the lifestyle of others, and they both developed products that filled a human need or needs.
Answer:
under foreign rule. native culture and industry were destroyed.
Explanation:
it led to slave trade which them led to social discrimination around the world, it also damaged the cultures and created disunity among the natives finally it stripped countries off their natural resources and left nothing for the natives.
A lot of them did return to their families, however the role of women in the factory was actually cemented in American and other cultures upon the war ending, so many women continued to work and even started careers. Cue second wave feminism.
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution <span> authorized the president to take "all necessary measures to repel armed attack" in Vietnam.
This resolution had significant consequences for the Vietnam War and beyond that time. In regard to the Vietnam War, it provided the justification for the president, Lyndon Johnson, to escalate US involvement in the war and magnify the number of US troops there by hundreds of thousands. In US foreign policy in general, it represented an increase of the power of the Commander in Chief (the president) to deploy troops without getting formal approval in advance from Congress.
</span>
