I dont quite understand, Please re-fraise ?
Answer:
1 and 4
Explanation:
1 and 4 are the most logical answers
Answer:
Might
Explanation:
Language Skills I Center Te IdNo I. Change the following statements in to passive form. 1. The commander ordered his troops to fire at their enemies. 2. The government taking measures on tax reduction to help the private sector. 3. The electoral board is getting ready to conduct election. 4. Most Ethiopian people eat Injera. 5. Police handovers the robbery's case to the attorney. II. Fill in the blank spaces with the appropriate modal verbs given in brac read when you were 4? (can, could, would) 1. 2. Abeba always get prizes from her school. She study hard. (might, (might be, mi
Answer:
In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Romeo and Juliet fit the literary archetype of star-crossed lovers as:
They are in love, they are doomed from the start, and their families would be upset if they knew Romeo and Juliet were in love.
The fate of Romeo and Juliet had a tragic ending because of the rivalry among the families. They became the victim of the rivalry which they have never been a part of. Misunderstandings, miscommunications and bad luck bring a tragic feel to the play. The audience feels pity for the couple who sacrificed their lives for true love.
Explanation:
Correct me if I am wrong
Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
