Answer:
diplomacy of the United States—particularly during President William Howard Taft's presidential term—was a form of American foreign policy to minimize the use or threat of military force and instead further its aims in Latin America and East Asia through the use of its economic power by guaranteeing loans made to foreign countries.[1] In his message to Congress on 3 December 1912, Taft summarized the policy of Dollar Diplomacy:
The diplomacy of the present administration has sought to respond to modern ideas of commercial intercourse. This policy has been characterized as substituting dollars for bullets. It is one that appeals alike to idealistic humanitarian sentiments, to the dictates of sound policy and strategy, and to legitimate commercial aims.[2]
Dollar diplomacy was not new, as the use of diplomacy to promote commercial interest dates from the early years of the Republic. However, under Taft, the State Department was more active than ever in encouraging and supporting American bankers and industrialists in securing new opportunities abroad. Bailey finds that dollar diplomacy was designed to make both people in foreign lands and the American investors prosper.[3]
The concept is relevant to both Liberia, where American loans were given in 1913, and Latin America. Latin Americans tend to use the term "dollar diplomacy" disparagingly to show their disapproval of the role that the U.S. government and U.S. corporations have played in using economic, diplomatic and military power to open up foreign markets. When Woodrow Wilson became president in March 1913, he immediately canceled all support for Dollar diplomacy. Historians agree that Taft's Dollar diplomacy was a failure everywhere. In the Far East, it alienated Japan and Russia and created a deep suspicion among the other powers hostile to American motives.[4][5]
"c. The city became a central hub for trade, which contributed to the empires growth" best describes the effect of Constantine moving the capital to Constantinople, since it was a thriving metropolis.
Pachacuti built a strong central government and also took his sons for training to Cuzco which ensured the loyalty.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Moreover, he also kept the local people as rulers which increased their loyalty towards him.
Local administrators were made to collaborate with regional level administrators who looked after justice, land, labour, etc. The regional rulers were told to report to the supreme Inca ruler.
Also, the heirs of the local rulers were kept as prisoners to ensure loyalty of their people.
China entity sponsored commercial expeditions in the Indian ocean in ships known as junks.
The Indian Ocean has been strategically located at the tip of the sea since ancient times, and its long coastline is the longest of any country on the Indian Ocean's rim, hence the name India.
This ocean occupies a unique place because of its features. As mentioned in Indian Ocean Facts, the water here has the highest concentration of dissolved and suspended hydrocarbons, the most negative water balance, and the highest and lowest salinity of any single water source.
City-states traded gold, ivory, and iron with landlocked kingdoms such as Greater Zimbabwe. These materials were sold to India, Southeast Asia, China, and elsewhere. These were African exports in the Indian Ocean trade. These items were in short supply in Asian countries and could be sold at a profit.
Learn more about the Indian Ocean here: brainly.com/question/24686699
#SPJ4
