Answer:
the senate chooses
Explanation:
If no candidate receives a majority of electoral votes, the House of Representatives elects the President from the three candidates who received the most electoral votes. Each state delegation has one vote. The Senate elects the Vice President from the two vice presidential candidates with the most electoral votes.
It's definitely not in a theocracy: those usually favour the majorities.
Also migrant labors don't specifically favour minorities.
Now, between democracies and command economies the choice is very hard, as it depends more on the specific country. So for example in many places the role of the minorities rose in command economies, since they went against the patriarchy (in China this was the case for example, the role of women in China improved drastically, while women and minorities are still struggling in Japan, which is a democracy). On the other hand, Nazi Germany was also a command economy, and yet it was very bad for minorities
I would say that the question is too complex to give just one answer, but I would also argue for option d)
Answer:
Hello There!!
Explanation:
Similar:
They both succeeded by developing cash-intensive crops. Both struggled with starvation and other harsh conditions. Both were driven by economic success over religious freedom.
Different:
The political structures of the Jamestown and Plymouth colonies were different in that the Plymouth colonists did not settle in the area specified in their charter, so they wrote their own governing rules.
Answer:
Explanation: The solution for this problems are found in the society due to the fact that the cause of the problem is usually in the society. Only the social approach can solve this problem since its nature is social, hence all the effort on this problem should be looked at from the social perspective.
Explanation:
C please give me brainly hope that helps btw
