1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mandarinka [93]
3 years ago
10

What will be the consequences of Jackson’s “getting his way” in politics for the nation and the role of future presidents?

History
1 answer:
Evgesh-ka [11]3 years ago
7 0

At that time, the most controversial decision made by Andrew Jackson would most likely be his efforts to move the Native Americans from their land.

He was a prominent supporter of making legislation that enable American military to take the native american land by force.

If, other representatives at that time let Jackson getting his way in politics, Future presidents would most likely had to deal with the after effects of ethnic cleansing initiated by Jackson, and the racial tension in united states might be even worse that it is today.

You might be interested in
The movement of 1919-1920, spawned by fear of Bolshevik revolution, that resulted in the arrest and deportation of many politica
Marrrta [24]

Answer:

<h2>The Red Scare</h2><h3>(technically, the First Red Scare)</h3>

Explanation:

What historians refer to as the first Red Scare occurred from 1919 to the early 1920s in the United States, following the Bolsvhevik Revolution which brought communism to power in Russia.   The Bolsheviks (meaning "the Majority") were the communist faction that led a successful overthrow of the regime of the tsar in Russia in 1917.   They weren't a "majority" in Russia, but they were the dominant group within the Russian communist movement.  Civil war in Russia followed during the next years, from 1917 into the early 1920s, ultimately leading to the establishment of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) in 1922.  There was fear in the United States (as there was elsewhere in the world) that communism would begin to spread further, beyond Russia.  Attorney General Mitchell Palmer used that fear as an excuse to arrest suspected radicals in the United States.

The more common reference to "The Red Scare" usually refers to what historically was the second Red Scare, from the late 1940s to late 1950s in the United States.  Following World War 2, as the Cold War developed and the Soviet Union was gathering allies, there was even greater fear -- and fear-mongering -- in the United States about the threat of communism.   The Second Red Scare was when  The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) was created and when Senator Joseph McCarthy began a campaign of accusations against suspected communists in various sectors of American life.

4 0
3 years ago
Which event finally brings an end to WWII?
ehidna [41]

Answer: Japan surrenders after the Soviet Union enters the war which marked the end of ww2.

Explanation: Nuclear weapons shocked Japan into surrendering at the end of World War II, which they didn't. Japan surrendered because the Soviet Union entered the war. Japanese leaders said the bomb forced them to surrender because it was less embarrassing to say they had been defeated by a miracle weapon.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who were the “Big Four” countries that met at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919?
Kipish [7]

Answer:

United Kingdom, France, the United States, and Italy

Explanation:

The “Big Four” dominated the proceedings that led to the formulation of the Treaty of Versailles, a treaty that ended World War I.

6 0
2 years ago
What was the relationship between Peter Minuit and the American Indians of New Netherland?
makkiz [27]

Answer:

Born in Wesel circa 1580, Peter Minuit joined the Dutch West Indian Company in the 1620s. Named director of the New Netherland colony in 1626, he is said to have negotiated a deal for the island of Manhattan with a Native American tribe and helped develop a profitable fur trade in the region.

8 0
3 years ago
By the 1700's, Austria and Spain were in conflict with each other over.
vichka [17]

Answer:

A)Territory in Italy

Explanation:

the event is called the war of Spanish succession which was related to who would success Spanish throne following the death of charles II who had not any child to succeed him.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • why did the North prevail in the civil war? What might have turned the tide of the war against the north?
    12·2 answers
  • What was one major result of the north’s victory in the civil war
    15·1 answer
  • What law states no colonists could settle west
    8·1 answer
  • A key issue that sparked the colonists to declare their independence from England was?​
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about the aztec people in mexico
    8·1 answer
  • How does the recent use of the filibuster compare to how it was used in the past? How might it be used in the future?
    10·1 answer
  • What is Canada biggest challenge as a country
    8·1 answer
  • Population growth and the domestication of plants and animals brought on new cultural changes, such as
    11·1 answer
  • Which information is provides by an I-9 tax form?
    8·1 answer
  • What purpose did ziggurats serve?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!