Do you agree with Mark’s reasoning? Is he correct that 2 is a rational number? Explain your answer.

1 answer:

3 0

Well, I don't know Mark's reasoning, but the square root of 2 is not a rational number. A rational number is a number that can be represented by a fraction - its decimal form must either be finite (have an end) or repeat (for example, 1/3 or .3333333...). The square root of 2 is infinite and cannot be written as a fraction, so it's not rational.

You might be interested in

Madelynn makes the following statement: "Since I have 28 people that I defi-

slava [35]

Answer:

The only problem was that now it costs more so not really

Step-by-step explanation:

I think its an opinion question

8 0

3 years ago

Why is 3 + (−5) equal to −2?

tamaranim1 [39]

Answer: since the 5 is a negative you are subtracting it from 3

so 3 +(-5) is actually 3-5. which = -2

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps

5 0

3 years ago

I need help plzzzzzzz!

myrzilka [38]

With what???!!??!! Lol

5 0

2 years ago

Lable -4 1/2, 5.6, -2 3/8 and 1.35 from least to greatest

tiny-mole [99]

-4 1/2, -2 3/8, 1.35, 5.6

5 0

3 years ago

5) A qué % anual se prestó un capital de 1700 soles que en 1 año y 3 meses ha producido 255 soles de interés?

patriot [66]

Answer:

12%

Step-by-step explanation:

Interés simple = Principal × Tasa × Tiempo

Tasa = Interés simple / Principal × Tiempo

Principal = 1700 soles

Tiempo = 1 año y 3 meses

12 meses = 1 año

3 meses = 3/12 = 1/4 = 0.25

Tiempo = 1.25 años

Tasa = 255 /1700 × 1.25

= 0.12

= 0.12 × 100

= 12%

7 0

3 years ago