1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hammer [34]
3 years ago
15

In her persuasive speech, martha spoke about the possibility of dirty nuclear weapons being used against the united states by ir

aq, iran, and north korea. she challenged her audience to monitor senate hearings on the problem and to get involved by writing or emailing their legislators. what form of motivation did martha successfully employ in her speech?
History
1 answer:
nata0808 [166]3 years ago
6 0
She used negative motivation. She kept talking about the bad aspects of it and how it might turn out that people were motivated to stop it. It is called negative motivation and it worked because many people accepted this and started raising more questions out of fear for their safety.
You might be interested in
How does India system education work out
Fofino [41]
The school system in India has four levels: lower primary(age 6 to 10), upper primary(11 to 12), high(13 to 15) and higher secondary(17 to 18). The lower primary school is divided into five”standards”, upper primary school into two, high school into three and higher secondary into two. Hopefully this helps you.
6 0
3 years ago
At almost the same time, Queen Ann came to the throne,
marishachu [46]

Answer:

The answer is:

Anglicans prohibited all Quakers from serving in public office.

The colony split into a pro-Quaker group and a pro-Church of England group.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
This Reformation leader nailed ninety-five reasons on the door of a church stating his objections to some of the Catholic Church
Rasek [7]
Martin Luther. He ended up starting the Protestant reformation this way
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain what the great compromise was? <br><br> Help me please
grin007 [14]

Answer:

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.

Explanation:

Hope I helped!

3 0
2 years ago
Many african nations are refusing to import donations of used clothing. this is similar to the…
bezimeni [28]

The refusal of African nations to collect used clothing is similar to the D. homespun movement in India

<h3>What is Importation?</h3>

This refers to the coming in of goods and services from one country to another for the purposes of trade mainly.

Hence, we can see that from the refusal of African nations from collecting used clothes from other nations, they are trying to protect their own indigenous textile production, similar to the homespun movement in India.

Read more about importation here:

brainly.com/question/16413246

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Carnegie’s early job with the railroads greatly contribute to his success in the steel business?
    13·2 answers
  • How did building New England towns and cities around a common help colonies develop a diverse economy?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the policy of containment, and how did it influence u.s. foreign policy?
    15·2 answers
  • Cuneiform writing used wedge-shaped symbols to represent what?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the bill of rights legally change the political system
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes how the Fed responds to recessions?
    10·2 answers
  • This image was created by a white man. How do you think the creator’s perspective might have biased this image
    7·1 answer
  • 5. How can this document be used to argue that Alexander was great?
    10·2 answers
  • Sedition is speaking favorable about the leaders of government. True O False​
    6·1 answer
  • Is the Divine Right of Kings a true belief of the people or not
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!