1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
3 years ago
5

Briefly describe ONE major difference between Potters and Holts historical interpretation of the Civil War.

History
1 answer:
lakkis [162]3 years ago
4 0
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>

Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:  

Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.  

Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:

Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.

You might be interested in
One of the problems faced by farmers in the late 1800s was that railroads
gtnhenbr [62]
Farmers faced Native American raids, poor growing conditions, droughts, disease, insects, and anything that would give farmers a hard time now. Farmers had to pay higher prices for transportation which caused less profit - crops prices fell which also caused less profit. The government issued greenbacks then retired them, causing an increase in the value of money in the circulation.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLSSSSS HELP ILL MARK YOU BRAINLIST
NeTakaya

Answer: B

Explanation: A Gulf War veteran, McVeigh sought revenge against the federal government for the 1993 Waco siege that ended in the deaths of 86 people, many of whom were children, as well as the 1992 Ruby Ridge incident and American foreign policy. He hoped to inspire a revolution against the federal government, and defended the bombing as a legitimate tactic against what he saw as a tyrannical government

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Japan's adoption of the Meiji Constitution
-BARSIC- [3]

Answer: it strengthened their economy

Explanation:

The Japanese adoption of the Meiji Constitution differ from China's administration at the end of the 19th

century due to theirs accelerated the progress of their economy. There was now industralization in Japan, which lead to the rise of the military in 1895. These industralization focuses on enriching the country and strengthening the military. This was the difference between theirs and the Chinese.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I know too that it is a maxim [principle] with us, and I think a wise one, not to entagle ourselves with the affairs' of Europe.
Naily [24]
The answer is D hopes this help :)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Supreme Court has unlimited original jurisdiction.<br> a. True<br> b. False
Romashka [77]

Answer:

true

have a great dayyyyyy

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What’s the answer to my question
    10·1 answer
  • What happened to the fish stocks in Europe?
    6·1 answer
  • Identify the playwright--Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, or Aristophanes--described in the following statement.
    11·2 answers
  • Which Greek scientist contributed to the field of mathematics?
    8·1 answer
  • NEED HELP IN HISTORY ASAP. WILL GIVE BRAINILEST <br><br> PLEASE HELP!! IT'S ONLY FIVE QUESTIONS
    6·2 answers
  • Qual a principal diferença entre os processos de colonização?
    6·1 answer
  • Give three examples of an economic indicato
    12·1 answer
  • T
    11·1 answer
  • What contributed to the French and Indian War? Check all that apply
    10·1 answer
  • Which event signaled the beginning of WWII for the United States?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!