Answer:
cant really see it that well but
1. it has alot of destruction in it
2. cant really see them(sorry)
3. the title is no-o-o(unless it's different and I just cant see it) I believe the author put that as the title because it shows anger and despair
4. to show how badly the Indians were treated and the author wanted to show how they might of felt through drawings.
5. yes because the indians were wronged by others because they were just simply nice at heart. that was simply their nature and others took advantage of that.
6. I would think it is negative because it shows alot of negative emotions
hope that helped and if it did pls mark brainiest:)
It benefited by hiring people based on how well they preform or just their abilities.
It was Italy, they were suffering massive dept and inflammation <span />
Hi Anna,
1. Government has been defined as “the institution created by a society to create and enforce public policies”. It has also been defined as “a group of people who have the power to make and enforce laws.” Which definitions better expresses what your understanding of government is? Explain your choice. If you find both definitions inadequate, write your own, and explain it.
Answer - I think that both defintions really explain what a government is because the first definition is true because it is true when is says "create and enforce public policies". And the second definition is always correct because for example there are many people in cogress that in enforce these policies.
2. List five purposes of government. Provide an example of government either real or fictional, fulfilling each.
- Protecting the Rights - Which means protecting the rights of voting and the freedom of speech.
- Promoting the Rule of Law - Enforcing laws that they think are appropiate for the current situtation.
- Preparing for Common Defense - To maintain a strong military force.
- Supporting the Economic System - Providing trade with other countries and keeping all the taxes reasonable for people to pay.
- Providing Public Services - For Example, building roads and stores for people to go to.
3. What is power? Why is understanding power essential to understanding government?
Answer - Power is the will to influence the people's behavior in various ways. It is essential to understand what power is to mean what the government does and how it functions.
4. Write a paragraph that compares and contrasts two types of government. Choose two types that both fall under the same category of government classification (i.e., by who has the power, by how much power the government has, by where the power is located, or by how the power is divided between branches).
Answer - 2 different types of a government is for example monarchy and democracy. Democracy is what we use in the U.S. and monarchy is something used in contries that have a King Or Queen. The major difference is the democracy has a president that only lasts 8 years the max. A monarchy is ruling a country as ong until that king or queen dies. The reason we don't use monarch because the people can easily overthrow the royal family. Democracy the president is dictated to stay unless they resign or don't go to anymore elections.
Hope This helps!
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
