So the question is asking how the person thats telling the story use the story to explain facts about the natural world or specific Cherokee traditions. its sort like using the creation of the story as an example
Answer:
A. As the speaker turns from mourning murder victims to accusing their executioner, the poem focuses on the injustice of the dictator's rule.
Explanation:
<u> A. is the right answer. Around line 30 of the poem the shift occurs, the poet talks about the dictator as the murderer and points finger at him as the unjust ruler and tyrant</u>. The author is explaining how it is the dictator’s fault that millions are dead and how he also has “the heart and the skull”, and so does the audience that claps and supports him, but which can become the victim as well.
B. is not the right answer. The poem does not explore the experiences of survivors' feelings of guilt.
C. is not the right answer. The poem does not call people to action against the dictator.
D. is not the right answer. There is no part about securing closure for certain, and the poem ends ambiguously.
Answer:
true
Explanation: thinking is required for reading
I would say that the best answer is A. C is definitely not the answer because of course, there is a relationship between art and literature.
Studying literature involves reading, thinking, interpreting, discussing, and writing. Studying art is analyzing and critiquing the artwork, as well as learning about the history of art. Putting both literature and art together creates a better understanding of the artwork and a more in-depth discussion about the artwork itself.
(I apologize for the late reply. Hopefully this answer is helpful to you though.)
