Answer:
warranty liablity account ending balance: 3,510,000
Explanation:
In total, we expect a warranty expense for 6% for each sale distributed among three years.
For the 32,000,000 million sales for 2019 we expect:
32,000,000 x 6% = 1,920,000 warranty expense.
warranty liaiblity
debit credit
beginning 3,370,000
expenditures 1,780,000
warranty expense <u> 1,920,000</u>
balance 3,510,000
A company had net income of $40,000, net sales of $300,000, and average total assets of $200,000. The profit margin and total asset turnover ratio are 13.3% each. 1.5.
There are two methods that can be used to calculate return on assets. The first method is to divide the company's net income by its average total assets. The second method is to multiply the company's net profit margin by sales.
Return on assets is calculated by dividing a company's after-tax earnings by total assets. The balance sheet total corresponds to the company's total equity and liabilities. This value can be found on the company's balance sheet.
Learn more about assets at
brainly.com/question/25746199
#SPJ4
Answer:
$152.4 million
Explanation:
The computation of the projected net income is shown below:
As we know that
Net income = (EBIT - interest) × (1 - tax rate)
where,
EBIT = Sales - operating cost
= $700 × 120% - ($700 × 120% × 65%)
= $840 - ($840 × 65%)
= $840 - $546
= $294
The interest expense and tax rate is $40 and 40%
So, the projected net income is
= ($294 - $40) × (1 - 40%)
= $152.4 million
We simply applied the above formula so that the projected net income could be come
Answer:
The fraud was discovered Option D: The operations manager found a check made payable to Phillips while searching Phillips' desk for some accounting records.
Explanation:
In the given case study, Ernie Phillips had got a job as a 'controller'. He had started writing checks to himself other than the payroll checks.
This fraud can be discovered when the operations manager found a check on Phillips desk which was payable to himself and it was other than the payroll check. Thus, Option D is the statement as an answer.
Cancelled checks do not have to do anything with the fraud, as per Option A, because cancelled checks are never cleared in the bank. The receiver doesn't usually receive a call before check clearance. So, Option B is also incorrect. No error was there in the check as stated in Option C.
The flexible strategy is used to avoid the delay in assessing the external constraints.
The following information regarding accessing external constraints:
- It could be thrust upon an organization.
- It permits for uncovering the things that are beyond the control.
- The example involved national holidays or sick leaves.
If we accessing the external constraints so the delay could be avoided.
So, The other options seem incorrect
Therefore we can conclude that the flexible strategy is used to avoid the delay in assessing the external constraints.
Learn more about the external constraints here: brainly.com/question/17156848
