The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
Answer:
I feel like this would be... A. Black Codes in the Post-Civil War South
Explanation:
Hopefully i'm right
Answer:
At the core of the samurai beliefs was their honor code known as bushido, but the bushido code was just the natural result of the three most important religions and philosophies the samurai followed – Shintoism, Confucianism, and Zen Buddhism.
If that's not the answer you were looking for let me know and I'll find a better one.
I think rome .rome seems like a higher state of army
A feeling of strong devotion to one's country is called : nationalism
People with nationalism principle tend to be capable to do anything in order to bring benefit to their country, such as waging war, conquering more territory for the country, etc
hope this helps
