Answer:
Pearl Harbor brought the U.S. into WWII, which changed the reason of why we would fight in the war, and potentially changed the outcome of World War II. ... Despite their ships being attacked many times by German submarines, that was not enough to make the U.S. enter the war.
The Battle of Stalingrad halted the German advance in World War II and marked the turning point of the war in Eastern Europe. ... Eisenhower, the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, led the D-Day invasion to begin the liberation of Western Europe.
Explanation:
Hope it helps army ;))) ♡
<span>. The US had always been an Isolationist country, meaning that they tried to stay out of foreign affairs. This is probably because of the difficulty we were experiencing internally. We ended up sending help to Britain and the Allied forces because they had more democratic governments, while the Axis forces were more authoritarian. The US was inclined to help democratic countries because they would be stronger allies and not nearly as hostile.</span>
The answer is letter D.
Explanation: Pericles was born in one of the noblest families of Athens, the Alcmeônidas. He had a strong character, was sober, incorruptible and reserved. Was elected a quarterback without interruption, from 443 BC to 429 BC. He had a great ancestry over the city of Athens.
His authority was great, and the period of his rule was known as the Pericles Era. The historian Thucydides states under Pericles' leadership Athens, though a democracy, was directed by the best citizen.
Answer:
Explanation:
Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase “overall consequences” of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself. For example, if you think that the whole point of morality is (a) to spread happiness and relieve suffering, or (b) to create as much freedom as possible in the world, or (c) to promote the survival of our species, then you accept consequentialism. Although those three views disagree about which kinds of consequences matter, they agree that consequences are all that matters. So, they agree that consequentialism is true. The utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham is a well known example of consequentialism. By contrast, the deontological theories of John Locke and Immanuel Kant are nonconsequentialist.
Consequentialism is controversial. Various nonconsequentialist views are that morality is all about doing one’s duty, respecting rights, obeying nature, obeying God, obeying one’s own heart, actualizing one’s own potential, being reasonable, respecting all people, or not interfering with others—no matter the consequences.
This article describes different versions of consequentialism. It also sketches several of the most popular reasons to believe consequentialism, along with objections to those reasons, and several of the most popular reasons to disbelieve it, along with objections to those reasons.
