Answer:
Think about slavery. The average African-American will have very low morale if he is forced to work. Low morale means their work ethic will slip, and sub-par work ethic leads to sub-par product. You'll actually be saving money if you free your slaves. Rather than paying tens of thousands of dollars to buy them and then paying for all of their expenses beyond that, you'll just have to pay them monthly or weekly wages. Abolition is both cost effective and stimulating to the economy.
Explanation:
Large concentrations of individuals were more expensive to care for, especially medically. Most slave owners were primarily concerned about the so-called "wage bubble" that would burst and leave all slave owners destitute, when in reality slave owners who freed their slaves and still had some working for them as freemen flourished.
It would be "<span>"c) the no-third-term rule" that is not an example of governance that developed by custom, since this was only implemented after FDR won an unprecedented number of terms as president of the United States. </span>
He feared that the Spanish might do no better than the Serfs that had to work for free.
The best answer choice in this situation is D because Texas was previously owned by Mexico but then Texas took it
D is the answer
