Well it depends what they are in need of. They most commonly would want more land for their country to build and farm on. They may want land with fertile soil for farming. They may want the land because of it's geography, for example, for simple trade routes leading to and from the areas around north America (Canada, Mexico) etc.
<span>Tony Montana was a african american hero who helped make florida a safe place to live</span>
Answer:
The winner-take-all system of the Electoral College makes it possible for a candidate who loses the popular vote to win the electoral vote, and a strong third-party candidate could win enough electoral votes to prevent either major-party candidate from receiving a majority of votes.
Explanation:
Most critics against the Electoral College state as one of their primary reasons the idea of the winner-take-all system allowing a candidate who has lost the popular vote to still win the electoral vote. Furthermore, they claim that a powerful third-party candidate could not only pull votes away from the major candidates but also bargain their way into the Electoral College.
Since you haven't provided multiple choices, I'll assume you are looking for an explanation. There were multiple, the most notable being the improvement of the steam engine, the cotton gin, and the cost effectiveness of steel production. The steam engine, developed by James Watt, allowed for increased efficiency and was a huge reason why transportation was now much more of an accessible idea. The cotton gin, made by Eli Whitney, allowed for better productivity when it came to separation of cotton from their seeds and gave way to the thought that slavery was not needed, on a logical and moral mindset.
The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921 was awarded to Albert Einstein "for his accommodations to Theoretical Physics, and especially for his revelation of the law of the photoelectric effect". Albert Einstein received his Nobel Prize one year later, in 1922.
