Answer:
Yes after the world war 2 the USA WAS LOST HALF OF THE AREA BECAUSE THE WAR WAS HAPPENED IN USA ONLY THAT TIME THE RUSSIA WAS THROW SOME BOMBS IN USA THAT TIME IN THAT AREA SOME HOUSES AND PEOPLE WAS NOT DIED THEY ARE EXPECTING BUT IN THAT AREA THE PIECE OF MAN ALSO NOT THERE AND THE WAR PLEASE ALSO SOME COLLAPSED THAT TIME THE RUSSIA WAS DEVELOPING MORE IN THEIR COUNTRY AND THEY FIRST IN THE GROWTH
Institutionally,
imperialism regularly brought about the centralization of energy. At the point
when settlements wound up noticeably autonomous they regularly either had
establishments that had a tendency to unify control passed on from frontier
run, or social and financial structures that unified power in a little first
class that tended to oppose development toward democratization.
Socially,
previous provincial states had subjective fringes that made it hard to make a
bound together and lucid society. Intensifying the ethnic divisions created by
subjective outskirts was the way that amid frontier period, the gap and
overcome strategy was regularly utilized. This made an atmosphere of doubt
between ethnic gatherings that showed itself in ethnic clash in the autonomous
states.
A few
experts differ that imperialism can be reprimanded for the worldwide south's
underdevelopment today. Some battle that Africa was immature before Europeans
arrived, so the clarification for the present underdevelopment must be looked
for in culture, geology or history that pre-date imperialism. They additionally
take note of that a few nations that were never colonized or just quickly
colonized likewise encounter underdevelopment today.
Different
pundits call attention to that the genuine pilgrim structure was very little in
many states and that such a little framework of people couldn't have caused the
far reaching changes that are frequently credited to pioneer run the show.
Also, a few
commentators point to the way that expansionism bettered the general population
in the states in some courses by enhancing future, training and wellbeing
rehearses. Further, the way that some previous settlements have made some
significant monetary progress likewise indicates the way that imperialism was
not determinative of financial results today.
I would like to say C, because they were imperialistic power who sought out many colonies through out the world and they were heavily militaristic about these colonies. But I would wait for a second answer before you choose C, as I am unsure of this.
This information was taken from the article <em>"Three Forks Area", </em>published by the Oklahoma Historical Society. The complete paragraph goes as follows:
One of the earliest people to set up trade in the Three Forks area was Jean Pierre Chouteau. He and his brother had been running a successful trading post for years in their St. Louis Headquarters .The trading post at Three Forks was set up on the Neosho River in 1796.
Jean's half-brother's name was August Chouteau.
It used motivational framing. The idea behind it is that it should motivate you to say no to drugs especially since many young adults who try drugs do it because they are pressured into it by their peers. The main idea was that they should say no instead of succumbing to the pressure.<span />
