The goal is basically to help people change negative styles as thinking as a way to change how they feel
At least one study has suggested that black Americans and Hispanic Americans showed less support for a jury trial than a bench trial.
The correct option is D (both b& c)
The main distinction between a bench trial and a jury trial is whether or not a jury will decide the case's conclusion or if the judge will do so.
If there is a jury trial it is the jury's responsibility to hear the evidence and determine which facts are true or incorrect.
However, there is no jury in a bench trial to hear the evidence and determine the veracity of each opposing party's case. Instead, the judge is now also responsible for doing this.
Thus black Americans and Hispanic Americans showed less support for a jury trial when compared to bench trial.
To learn more about bench trial click here:
brainly.com/question/249570
#SPJ4
Answer:
B. their ownership of factors of production, how much they sell in the factor markets, and the prices received when sold
Explanation:
Ownership of factor of productions such as land, capital, labour and entrepreneurship services hired to a firm determines the income level of a family. A household can generate income from a land they hire out or produce on, they can also generate income from capital used in an investment. They can sell factors of production such as labour and technical know-how in the factor market and get paid for it. These are the major determinants of income flow in a household.
Answer:
unconditioned response
Explanation:
Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov put up the theory of classical conditioning, which is a learning mechanism that takes place through a combination of environmental stimuli and natural stimuli. In simple terms, the unconditioned stimulus ( UCS) induces an unconditioned response in the individual. This signifies that the stimulus in the setting has generated a response that is unconditioned or we can say an unlearned behavior. This a stage before conditioning takes place.
Answer:
The court's enforcement of the contract calls for Edward to pay compensation to Janie.
Explanation:
Janie sued Edward for refusing to comply with the contract that they established. In that case, there was a breach of contract, which is what happens when a contract is established between two people and one of those people does not buy some or all of the agreements established in the contract.
In that case, it is necessary that the person who violated the contract pays compensation to the other person as a way to compensate for all the problem caused by the breach of the contract. For this reason, Edward needed to sell an emerald necklace.
